Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1971–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2019See Thomas, 260 Mich App at 457 . -7- Moreover, Carter has presented no record evidence sufficient to rebut the strong presumption that his trial counsel employed effective strategy with regard to DR’s in-court identification. | 1 | 1 |
Brady v. Marylandgreen2 sentences1971Defense counsel relies upon Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 US 83, 87 ( 83 S Ct 1194, 1196, 1197 ; 10 L Ed 2d 215, 218 ) for the proposition that the good faith of the prosecutor is immaterial under the standards there imposed. 1971Defense counsel relies upon Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 US 83, 87 ( 83 S Ct 1194, 1196, 1197 ; 10 L Ed 2d 215, 218 ) for the proposition that the good faith of the prosecutor is immaterial under the standards there imposed. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Castillo
green
2 sentences2021The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defense counsel’s request to admit a demonstrative exhibit because the elements of the Carter test provided in Castillo, 230 Mich App at 444-445 , were not met. 2021The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defense counsel’s request to admit a demonstrative exhibit because the elements of the Carter test provided in Castillo, 230 Mich App at 444-445 , were not met. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Watkins v. Ford
green
2 sentences2004An account stated consists of a "`balance struck between the parties on a settlement....'" Keywell & Rosenfeld v. Bithell, 254 Mich.App. 300, 331 , 657 N.W.2d 759 (2002), quoting Watkins v. Ford, 69 Mich. 357, 361 , 37 N.W. 300 (1888). "`[W]here a plaintiff is able to show that the mutual dealings which have occurred between two parties have been adjusted, settled, and a balance struck, the law implies a promise to pay that balance.' " Id. 2004An account stated consists of a "`balance struck between the parties on a settlement....'" Keywell & Rosenfeld v. Bithell, 254 Mich.App. 300, 331 , 657 N.W.2d 759 (2002), quoting Watkins v. Ford, 69 Mich. 357, 361 , 37 N.W. 300 (1888). "`[W]here a plaintiff is able to show that the mutual dealings which have occurred between two parties have been adjusted, settled, and a balance struck, the law implies a promise to pay that balance.' " Id. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Keywell & Rosenfeld v. Bithell
green
2 sentences2004An account stated consists of a "`balance struck between the parties on a settlement....'" Keywell & Rosenfeld v. Bithell, 254 Mich.App. 300, 331 , 657 N.W.2d 759 (2002), quoting Watkins v. Ford, 69 Mich. 357, 361 , 37 N.W. 300 (1888). "`[W]here a plaintiff is able to show that the mutual dealings which have occurred between two parties have been adjusted, settled, and a balance struck, the law implies a promise to pay that balance.' " Id. 2004An account stated consists of a "`balance struck between the parties on a settlement....'" Keywell & Rosenfeld v. Bithell, 254 Mich.App. 300, 331 , 657 N.W.2d 759 (2002), quoting Watkins v. Ford, 69 Mich. 357, 361 , 37 N.W. 300 (1888). "`[W]here a plaintiff is able to show that the mutual dealings which have occurred between two parties have been adjusted, settled, and a balance struck, the law implies a promise to pay that balance.' " Id. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Wickings v. Arctic Enterprises, Inc
green
2 sentences2004Wickings v. Arctic Enterprises, Inc., 244 Mich.App. 125, 150 , 624 N.W.2d 197 (2001). 2004Wickings v. Arctic Enterprises, Inc., 244 Mich.App. 125, 150 , 624 N.W.2d 197 (2001). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Russell
green
1 sentence2014People v Russell, 297 Mich App at 716 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.