Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McFarland
green
2 sentences2018State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 338 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 2018State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 338 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Knapstad
green
2 sentences2007In Knapstad , the court determined that the trial court has the “inherent power” to dismiss a prosecution if the State fails to show it has evidence establishing a prima facie case, and that dismissal of a case where the State fails to show it had a prima facie case is in the interests of justice. 107 Wn.2d at 351-52 . 2007In Knapstad , the court determined that the trial court has the "inherent power" to dismiss a prosecution if the State fails to show it has evidence establishing a prima facie case and that dismissal of a case where the State fails to show it had a prima facie case is in the interests of justice. 107 Wash.2d at 351-52 , 729 P.2d 48 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2018App. 495, 500 , 601 P.2d 982 (1979). 39 Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687-88 . -9- No. 75381-9-1/ 10 Because we can conceive of a strategic reason for not requesting a Carter instruction, defense counsel's performance was not objectively unreasonable for failing to request a Carter instruction. 2018App. 495, 500 , 601 P.2d 982 (1979). 39 Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687-88 . -9- No. 75381-9-1/ 10 Because we can conceive of a strategic reason for not requesting a Carter instruction, defense counsel's performance was not objectively unreasonable for failing to request a Carter instruction. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. King
green
2 sentences2018App. 495, 500 , 601 P.2d 982 (1979). 39 Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687-88 . -9- No. 75381-9-1/ 10 Because we can conceive of a strategic reason for not requesting a Carter instruction, defense counsel's performance was not objectively unreasonable for failing to request a Carter instruction. 2018App. 495, 500 , 601 P.2d 982 (1979). 39 Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687-88 . -9- No. 75381-9-1/ 10 Because we can conceive of a strategic reason for not requesting a Carter instruction, defense counsel's performance was not objectively unreasonable for failing to request a Carter instruction. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Carter v. Kentucky
green
1 sentence2014We answer both questions "no." Necessity for Instruction In Carter v. Kentucky, 450 U.S. at 303 , the United States Supreme Court held that, upon request, a jury must be instructed that it can draw no adverse inference from a defendant's failure to testify. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Schaller
green
1 sentence2013There is no reason for the court to provide the defendant with another attorney at public expense." "[A] defendant does not have an absolute right under the Sixth Amendment to his choice of a particular advocate." State v. Schaller. 143 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Carter
green
1 sentence2007The Supreme Court held that Carter’s arguments were “unsupported and without merit.” Carter, 151 Wn.2d at 129 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Kwan Fai Mak
green
2 sentences1995State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 701 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). *13 In denying Mr. Carter's motion for mistrial, the trial court reasoned: I'm going to deny the motion for mistrial because number one, there is no specific reference to what type of history.... 1995State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 701 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). *13 In denying Mr. Carter's motion for mistrial, the trial court reasoned: I'm going to deny the motion for mistrial because number one, there is no specific reference to what type of history.... | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Walker v. Illinois
green
1 sentence1995State v. Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 701 , 718 P.2d 407 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986). *13 In denying Mr. Carter's motion for mistrial, the trial court reasoned: I'm going to deny the motion for mistrial because number one, there is no specific reference to what type of history.... | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.