C.F.R. » Title 47 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—COMMON CARRIER SERVICES › PART 20—COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICES

47 C.F.R. § 20.18

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases, 2005–2019 · leading case: In re the United States, 724 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re the United States, 724 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “See FCC Commercial Mobile Services, 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 (h)(1) (2012) (requiring cell phone carriers to have, by 2012, the ability to locate phones within 100 meters of 67% of calls and 300 meters for 95% of calls for network based calls, and to be able to locate phones within 50…”
Prado Navarette v. California, 134 S. Ct. 1683 (2014). “47 CFR § 20.18 (d)(1) (2013) (FCC's "Phase I enhanced 911 services" requirements).”
In Re Application for Pen Register & Trap/Trace Device With Cell Site Location Auth., 396 F. Supp. 2d 747 (S.D. Tex. 2005). “See 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 (h) (2005). Location based services (LBS) are part of the next wave of cell phone features coming to the wireless marketplace.”
Commonwealth v. Almonor, 120 N.E.3d 1183 (Mass. 2019). “" 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 (e) (2018) (requiring service providers to "provide to the [police] .”
In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Info. of a Specified Wireless Tel., 849 F. Supp. 2d 526 (D. Maryland 2011). “See 47 C.F.R. 20.18(h) (2011) (establishing accuracy and reliability standards of 100 meters for 67 *533 percent of calls and 300 meters for 95 percent of calls for network-based (non-GPS) technologies, and 50 meters for 67 percent of calls and 150 meters for 95 percent of calls…”
Ford, Jon Thomas, 477 S.W.3d 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015). “18 (d)(1) (“licensees subject to this section must provide the 'telephone number of the originator of a 911 call and the location of the cell site or base station receiving a 911 call from any mobile handset accessing their systems”). 11 . AT & T apparently retains historical…”
In Re of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, 747 F. Supp. 2d 827 (S.D. Tex. 2010). “See 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 (h)(l)(2008). 96 . Ex. 16 (emphasis added).”
In Re United States for an Order Directing a Provider of Elec. Commc'n Serv. to Disclose Records to the Gov't, 534 F. Supp. 2d 585 (W.D. Pa. 2008). “See 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 (2004) (requiring that licensees "achieve 95 percent penetration of location-capable handsets” among subscribers by end 2005); Laurie Thomas Lee, Can Police Track Your Wireless Calls? Call Location Information and Privacy Law, 21 Cardozo Arts & Ent.”
In Re of the United States for an Order Authorizing the Release of Historical Cell-Site Info., 736 F. Supp. 2d 578 (E.D.N.Y 2010). “” 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 (h)(l)(ii). 21 . Two articles published in the brief period that the instant application has been pending illustrate that growing awareness and concern.”
In Re Application for Order of a Pen Register, 402 F. Supp. 2d 597 (D. Maryland 2005). “See 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 (h)(1). As the technology develops and more cell phone towers are built, the accuracy will only improve.”
Baemmert v. Credit One Bank, N.A., 271 F. Supp. 3d 1043 (W.D. Wis. 2017). “See 47 C.F.R. § 20.18 . So Baemmert’s ability to make 911 calls does not show that he had cellular service.”
City of Missoula v. Tye, 2016 MT 153 (Mont. 2016). “See 47 C.F.R. 20.18(e)-(h). Lounsbury explained that 911 dispatchers generally do not plot the GPS coordinates because they lack precision.”
Show all 24 citing cases →
— 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(e) — 1 case
City of Missoula v. Tye, 2016 MT 153 (Mont. 2016). “See 47 C.F.R. 20.18(e)-(h). Lounsbury explained that 911 dispatchers generally do not plot the GPS coordinates because they lack precision.”
— 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(h) — 1 case
In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Info. of a Specified Wireless Tel., 849 F. Supp. 2d 526 (D. Maryland 2011). “See 47 C.F.R. 20.18(h) (2011) (establishing accuracy and reliability standards of 100 meters for 67 *533 percent of calls and 300 meters for 95 percent of calls for network-based (non-GPS) technologies, and 50 meters for 67 percent of calls and 150 meters for 95 percent of calls…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.