5 C.F.R. § 1201.120
Judicial review
Any employee or applicant for employment who is adversely affected by a final order or decision of the Board under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7703 may obtain judicial review as provided by 5 U.S.C. 7703. As § 1201.175 of this part provides, an appropriate United States district court has jurisdiction over a request for judicial review of cases involving the kinds of discrimination issues described in 5 U.S.C. 7702.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1998–2020 · leading case: Lawrence Niskey v. John F. Kelly, 859 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Lawrence Niskey v. John F. Kelly, 859 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “§§ 7702 , 7703(b); see also 5 C.F.R. §§ 1201.120 , 1201.175; 29 C.F.R.”
Darlene BUTLER, Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Sec'y, Dep't of the Army, Appellee, 164 F.3d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “§ 7703 (b)(1); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.120 ; Powell v. Department of Defense, 158 F.”
Sloan v. West, 140 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir. 1998). “§ 1295 ; 5 C.F.R. § 1201.120 (1997); 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)(1); Synan v.”
Baca v. Dep't of Army, 983 F.3d 1131 (10th Cir. 2020). “5 C.F.R. §§ 1201.120 & 1201.157. Because Mr.”
Stoll v. Principi, 449 F.3d 263 (1st Cir. 2006). “, 5 C.F.R. § 1201.120 (providing for review of final Board decisions in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).”
Frank v. Ridge, 310 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2004). “§ 7703 (b); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1201.120 , 1201.157, 1201.175; 29 C.”
Nater v. Riley, 114 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.P.R. 2000). “§ 1295 ; 5 C.F.R. § 1201.120 . On the other hand, if the MSPB determines that it has jurisdiction, and decides the merits of both the non-discrimination claim and the discrimination claim, the case becomes a “mixed case appeal.”
Stephens v. Dep't of the Army, 249 F. App'x 182 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “5 C.F.R. § 1201.120 provides that “any employee .”
O'Leary v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 144 F. App'x 877 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “§ 7703 and 5 C.F.R. § 1201.120 . A. Standard of Review The court will overturn a decision of the Board if it is “(1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation…”
Baca v. Dep't of Army, 973 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2020). “5 C.F.R. §§ 1201.120 & 1201.157. Because Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.