7 C.F.R. § 7.21
Terms of office of county committee members
(a) The term of office of county committee members and alternates to such office will begin on a date fixed by the Deputy Administrator, which will be after their election or appointment.
(b) Before any county committee member or alternate to the county committee may take office as a county committee member, such person must sign an oath of office to pledge that they will faithfully, fairly, and honestly perform to the best of their ability all of the duties devolving on them as committee members.
(c) A term of office will continue until a successor is elected and qualified as specified in §§ 7.8 and 7.9 or appointed as specified in § 7.17.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2023 · leading case: Hedman v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 304 (Ct. Cl. 1988).
Hedman v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 304 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “7 C.F.R. § 7.21 (b); Publication 22-PM, Part 5, till 87 and 88.”
Miller v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. Farm Servs. Agency, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998). “§ 590h(b)(5)(E); 7 C.F.R. § 7.21 (b)(2). Eleven years later, in March 1994, the Alabama State ASCS Committee ("the Alabama Committee") held a hearing to consider removing Miller from his position because of charges that he had violated ASCS policies upon his receipt of…”
Wheeler Cnty. Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Gilder, 568 S.E.2d 786 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). “” 7 CFR § 7.21 (a). As a county tax assessor, Gilder’s duties are, generally, the ascertainment of taxable property, assessments and penalties against unretumed property, and changing real property values established by appeal in prior years.”
Jon Hedman v. Dep't of Agric., 915 F.2d 1552 (Fed. Cir. 1990). “” 7 C.F.R. § 7.21 (b)(2) (1990). The USDA has issued an “ASCS Handbook” for County Office Personnel Management, entitled 22-PM (Revision 1).”
Westcott v. United States Dep't of Agric., 611 F. Supp. 351 (D. Neb. 1984). “Furthermore, the only decision that could be subject to review is the deputy administrator’s final decision affirming the state ASCS committee’s determination that the plaintiff’s farms must remain separate.”
Krueger v. Lyng, 927 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir. 1991). “” 7 CFR § 7.21 (1987). 3 The CED is “responsible for the day-to-day operations of the county office” and executes the policies established by the county committee.”
Hamlet v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 62 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “The county committee employs the county executive director, who serves at the pleasure of the county committee, 7 CFR § 7.21 (b), and is responsible for carrying out the policies established by the county committee.”
Miller v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. Farm Servs. Agency, 966 F. Supp. 1087 (N.D. Ala. 1997). “7 C.F.R. § 7.21 (a). The members of the county committees were not appointed, but rather were elected from among the farmers in the county.”
Moore v. Glickman, 113 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 1997). “7 C.F.R. § 7.21 (b)(2). The members of the county committees are farmers who are elected, not appointed, to their positions, and so are not themselves "employees" under the CSRA.”
DCP Farms v. Yeutter, 761 F. Supp. 1269 (N.D. Miss. 1991). “§ 590h(b); 7 C.F.R. § 7.21 (a). The county committee makes the initial determination regarding a producer’s eligibility for payments under the various federal farm programs.”
Miller v. USDA Farm Servs. Agency, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998). “§ 590h(b)(5)(E); 7 C.F.R. § 7.21 (b)(2). Eleven years later, in March 1994, the Alabama State ASCS Committee (“the Alabama Committee”) held a hearing to consider removing Miller from his position because of charges that he had violated ASCS policies upon his receipt of…”
Eileen Buchholz v. George Aldaya, 210 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2000). “§ 2105 (a)(1)(D); 7 C.F.R. §§ 7.21 (b)(2), 7.25(b)(1); Krueger v.”
— 7 C.F.R. § 7.21(b)(2) — 1 case
Eileen Buchholz v. George Aldaya Michael W. O'COnnOr & Mariellen Ross, Individually & in Their Off. Capacities With the Farm Serv. Agency of the United States Dep't of Agric., 210 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2000).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.