9 C.F.R. § 300.2

FSIS responsibilities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Delegations of authority. The Secretary of Agriculture and Under Secretary for Food Safety have delegated to the Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service the responsibility for exercising the functions of the Secretary of Agriculture under various statutes (see 7 CFR 2.7, 2.18, and 2.53).

(b) Implementing regulations. This chapter of title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations (9 CFR chapter III) includes, in addition to administrative rules, rules and regulations that implement provisions of the following statutes:

(1) The Federal Meat Inspection Act, as amended (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), except provisions pertaining to the inspection and certification of the condition of animals for export, and related legislation;

(2) The Poultry Products Inspection Act, as amended (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.);

(3) The Egg Products Inspection Act, as amended (EPIA) (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.), except for the shell egg surveillance program, voluntary laboratory analyses of egg products, and the voluntary grading program;

(4) The Humane Slaughter Act (7 U.S.C. 1901-1906);

(5) The Talmadge-Aiken Act (7 U.S.C. 450), with respect to cooperation with States in the administration of the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act;

(6) The Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627), relating to voluntary inspection of poultry and edible products thereof; voluntary inspection and certification of technical animal fat; certified products for dogs, cats, and other carnivora; voluntary inspection of rabbits and edible products thereof; and voluntary inspection and certification of edible meat and other products; and

(7) The National Laboratory Accreditation Program (7 U.S.C. 138-138i) with respect to laboratories accredited only for pesticide residue analysis in meat and poultry products.

[63 FR 72354, Dec. 31, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 253, Jan. 5, 2004]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: Christina Webb v. Trader Joe's Co., 999 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Christina Webb v. Trader Joe's Co., 999 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 2021). “9 C.F.R. § 300.2 (a). In order to produce poultry products containing any amount of retained water, a covered poultry producer like Trader Joe’s must “maintain on file and make available to FSIS its written data-collection protocol” for how the company arrived at the claimed…”

United States Ex Rel. Barrick v. Parker-Migliorini Int'l, LLC, 878 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2017). “9 C.F.R. § 300.2 . The export certification process normally involves the following three steps.”

Robert Cohen v. Conagra Brands, Inc., 16 F.4th 1283 (9th Cir. 2021). “The Secretary delegated authority to oversee poultry products to FSIS, 9 C.F.R. § 300.2 (a), and FSIS promulgated regulations to govern the label approval 8 COHEN V.”

United Source One, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Agric., Food Saf. & Inspection Serv., 865 F.3d 710 (D.C. Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “9 C.F.R. § 300.2 (b)(1). “[D]ay or night,” FSIS inspectors have access to an official establishment to ensure that it operates in sanitary conditions and that its meat is not “adulterated.”

Animal Legal Def. Fund v. United States Dep't of Agric., 223 F. Supp. 3d 1008 (C.D. Cal. 2016). “§ 463(b), which the Secretary has in turn delegated to FSIS, 9 C.F.R. § 300.2 (a), (b)(2). 3. Analysis Plaintiffs challenge FSlS’s decision on three grounds: (1) its explanation for why hepatic lipidosis does not render the liver unfit for human consumption is “nonsensical and…”

Dawkins Ex Rel. Est. of Dawkins v. United States, 226 F. Supp. 2d 750 (M.D.N.C. 2002). “Pursuant to 9 C.F.R. § 300.2 , the FSIS is charged with implementing several Acts of Congress, among them the Poultry Products Inspection Act, 21 U.”

Nw. Selecta, Inc. v. Gonzalez-Beiro, 145 F.4th 9 (1st Cir. 2025). “§ 463(a)-(b); 9 C.F.R. § 300.2 (a), (b)(2). Pursuant to that authority, the FSIS has promulgated hundreds of implementing regulations.”

Wong v. Foster Farms CA1/2 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022). “( 9 C.F.R. § 300.2 (a) & (b)(2).) During processing, recently slaughtered poultry carcasses are chilled to cool them down to a safe temperature.”

Fields v. Brown (E.D. Tex. 2021). “9 C.F.R. § 300.2 (a), (b)(2). The PPIA re- quires the FSIS to inspect domesticated birds when slaughtered and processed into products for human consumption.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.