Florida Statute 484.005 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 484
DISPENSING OF OPTICAL DEVICES AND HEARING AIDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 484.005

484.005 Authority to make rules.—The board has authority to adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement the provisions of this part conferring duties upon it. Such rules shall include, but not be limited to, rules relating to:

(1) A standard of practice for opticians licensed pursuant to this part.

(2) Minimum equipment which shall be utilized to prepare, fit, measure, and dispense lenses, spectacles, eyeglasses, contact lenses, and other optical devices allowed under the practice of opticianry.

(3) Procedures for transfer of prescription files upon the going out of business of an optician, corporation, or other person.

(4) A standard of practice for filling prescriptions for contact lenses and fitting, adapting, and dispensing contact lenses.

History.—ss. 1, 5, ch. 79-275; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 3, 11, 12, ch. 86-254; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 156, ch. 98-200.

F.S. 484.005 on Google Scholar

F.S. 484.005 on Casetext

Amendments to 484.005

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 484.005

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 484.005.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 484.005

Total Results: 11

FRANK LEYTE-VIDAL v. VERONICA LEYTE-VIDAL

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-10-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: weeks per year ÷ 12 months = $1,484). 5 On remand, the trial court

DARREN JOSEPH TINKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-06-08T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: See Pryear, 243 So. 3d at 484. 5 Despite no testimony of

Florida Dept. of Revenue v. NAVAL AVIATION

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-07-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 907 So. 2d 586

Snippet: not enjoyed by private individuals. 316 U.S. at 484-5, 62 S.Ct. at 1170. Then, in Dep't of Employment

US Shoe Corp. v. DEPT. OF PRO. REG.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-04-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 578 So. 2d 376

Snippet: conclusions of law in the final order identify Sections 484.005 and 484.007(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), as …under review. The pertinent language in Section 484.005, relied on in the order, authorizes the Board to…accomplish the broad purposes stated in Section 484.005. We find nothing in these statutory provisions,…the same office area or building." Section 484.005 sets forth the Board's authority to make rules…clear that the rulemaking power granted in Section 484.005 is substantially circumscribed, as that section

United States Shoe Corp. v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Opticianry

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-04-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 578 So. 2d 376, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3801

Snippet: conclusions of law in the final order identify Sections 484.005 and 484.007(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), as …under review. The pertinent language in Section 484.005, relied on in the order, authorizes the Board to…accomplish the broad purposes stated in Section 484.005. We find nothing in these statutory provisions,…within the same office area or building.” Section 484.005 sets forth the Board’s authority to make rules …clear that the rulemaking power granted in Section 484.005 is substantially circumscribed, as that section

Canal Authority v. Ocala Mfg., Ice & Packing Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-04-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 332 So. 2d 321

Snippet: Public Law 86-645, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 480, 484-5. To comply with federally imposed conditions for

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1975-04-14T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: in this state. Finally, as a further example, s. 484.05, F.S., places the responsibility for approving

Pancoast v. Pancoast

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-12-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 107 So. 2d 787

Snippet: case. In re Paulson’s Will, 127 Wis. 612, 107 N.W. 484, 5 L.R.A.,N.S., 804, 7 Ann.Cas. 652. We are called

Franklin v. Boardman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1947-02-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 29 So. 2d 24, 158 Fla. 477, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 545

Snippet: the real estate broker for whom Hull acted) *Page 484 5% of the purchase price which she accepted for the

Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Foxworth

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1899-01-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 41 Fla. 1

Snippet: W. R. Co. v. Gibson, 97 Ga. 489, 25 S. E. Rep. 484, 5 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cas. (n. s.) 441. And if the

Grady v. Jeffares

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1889-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 25 Fla. 743

Snippet: properly overruled. See also 3 Sutherland on Damages, 484-5-6; Wardell vs. Fosdick et al., 13 Johnson (N. Y.