Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 15
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-04-27
Snippet: (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); § 772.103(1), Fla. Stat.; § 772.102(4), Fla. Stat.; § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. Accordingly
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-02-01
Citation: 79 So. 3d 855, 2012 WL 280242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1346
Snippet: remedies for violations of section 772.103. Section 772.102 .defines a “pattern of criminal activity” as “engaging
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-28
Citation: 2 So. 3d 1041, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 578, 2009 WL 187708
Snippet: violations of sections 772.104(1), 772.103(3), and 772.102(1)(a)10., Florida Statutes, which are RICO claims
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-02
Citation: 842 So. 2d 200, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2003 WL 1720387
Snippet: least two incidents of criminal activity. See § 772.102(4), Fla. Stat. (2002). The criminal activity alleged
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-10-11
Citation: 779 So. 2d 421, 2000 WL 1505007
Snippet: triggered its rights under this chapter. See § 772.102(1)(a)10., Fla. Stat. (1995). The jury returned
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-17
Citation: 734 So. 2d 1038, 1999 WL 424384
Snippet: action under the specific authority of sections 772.102(1)(a)(12), 772.103, 772.104 and 787.01, Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-02-10
Citation: 727 So. 2d 1001, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1290, 1999 WL 68584
Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See §§ 836.05, 772.102, .103, .104, Fla. Stat. (1997); Metropolitan Life Ins.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-10-02
Citation: 681 So. 2d 301, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10293, 1996 WL 556840
Snippet: counterclaim based upon Florida Statute section 772.102, Florida’s civil RICO statute. Hartford predicated
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-13
Citation: 672 So. 2d 848, 1996 WL 106377
Snippet: criminal practices. *850 In 30 subparagraphs, section 772.102 designates each statutory provision included within
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-10-18
Citation: 663 So. 2d 1340, 1995 WL 608507
Snippet: criminal enterprise within the meaning of section 772.102(3), Florida Statutes, and associated for the common
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-12-27
Citation: 593 So. 2d 234, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12752, 1991 WL 273700
Snippet: Appellees also sued for violation of section 772.102, Florida Statutes (1989), but the jury found in
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-24
Citation: 578 So. 2d 823, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3785, 1991 WL 63773
Snippet: never a part of the Lawsons’ case in chief. See §§ 772.102-772.11. Our analysis is not founded on sophistry;
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-05-08
Citation: 566 So. 2d 3, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3151, 1990 WL 58285
Snippet: Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, § 772.102, Fla. Stat. (1987), theft, Florida Communications
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-28
Citation: 557 So. 2d 646, 1990 WL 17503
Snippet: sought to be brought under authority of sections 772.102(1)(a)(12), 772.103, 772.104 and 787.01, Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-12-01
Citation: 516 So. 2d 1011, 1987 WL 2005
Snippet: alia, of a pattern of criminal extortions, see §§ 772.102(1)(a)(22), 772.103, 772.104, Fla. Stat. (Supp.