Florida Statute 772.103 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS

Chapter 772
CIVIL REMEDIES FOR CRIMINAL PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 772.103

772.103 Prohibited activities.—It is unlawful for any person:

(1) Who has with criminal intent received any proceeds derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of criminal activity or through the collection of an unlawful debt to use or invest, whether directly or indirectly, any part of such proceeds, or the proceeds derived from the investment or use thereof, in the acquisition of any title to, or any right, interest, or equity in, real property or in the establishment or operation of any enterprise.

(2) Through a pattern of criminal activity or through the collection of an unlawful debt, to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise or real property.

(3) Employed by, or associated with, any enterprise to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in such enterprise through a pattern of criminal activity or the collection of an unlawful debt.

(4) To conspire or endeavor to violate any of the provisions of subsection (1), subsection (2), or subsection (3).

History.—s. 3, ch. 86-277.

F.S. 772.103 on Google Scholar

F.S. 772.103 on Casetext

Amendments to 772.103

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 772.103

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 772.103.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 772.103

Total Results: 20

Petro Welt Trading ges.M.B.h v. Edward Brinkmann

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-08

Snippet: Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, section 772.103 of the Florida Statutes; (9) conspiracy to commit

PLASTIQUIM, S.A. v. ODEBRECHT CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-04-27

Snippet: , 599 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); § 772.103(1), Fla. Stat.; § 772.102(4), Fla. Stat.; § 95

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Lewis Tein, P.L.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-09

Citation: 227 So. 3d 656

Snippet: remedies for criminal practices pursuant to section 772.103(3), Florida Statutes, and four counts of malicious

Navas v. Brand

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-29

Citation: 130 So. 3d 766, 2014 WL 305163, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1024

Snippet: subsection (1), subsection (2), or subsection (3). § 772.103, Fla. Stat. (2013).

Eagletech Communications, Inc. v. Bryn Mawr Investment Group, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-02-01

Citation: 79 So. 3d 855, 2012 WL 280242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1346

Snippet: Practices Act — Florida’s RICO equivalent. Section 772.103, Florida Statutes, makes it unlawful for any person

Bortell v. White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-28

Citation: 2 So. 3d 1041, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 578, 2009 WL 187708

Snippet: Bortell alleges violations of sections 772.104(1), 772.103(3), and 772.102(1)(a)10., Florida Statutes, which

Waterhouse Const. Group v. 5891 Sw 64th St.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-02-07

Citation: 949 So. 2d 1095, 2007 WL 403721

Snippet: that Zosman, DeLeon, and Triana violated section 772.103, Florida Statutes, by engaging in a pattern of

Siegel v. Whitaker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-11-09

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1079, 2006 WL 3228526

Snippet: conversion, civil theft, RICO violations and Chapter 772.103(4) violations against Ginsberg and MLG and waste

Bambu v. EI Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-05-26

Citation: 881 So. 2d 565

Snippet: The nurseries sought to recover under section 772.103(3) of the Florida Statutes which makes it "unlawful

Sunset Harbour North Condo. Assoc. v. Bedzow

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-02

Citation: 842 So. 2d 200, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2003 WL 1720387

Snippet: disseminating misleading advertisements. Section 772.103, Florida Statutes (2002), requires active participation

Stone v. Wall

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-17

Citation: 734 So. 2d 1038, 1999 WL 424384

Snippet: specific authority of sections 772.102(1)(a)(12), 772.103, 772.104 and 787.01, Florida Statutes (1987), pertaining

Haddad v. Cura

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-08

Citation: 674 So. 2d 168, 1996 WL 228977

Snippet: reason of any violation of the provisions of s. 772.103 shall have a cause of action for threefold the

Lavornia v. Rivers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-09

Citation: 669 So. 2d 288, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 910, 1996 WL 50105

Snippet: in Count III: *28959. In violation of section 772.103(1), Florida Statutes, RIVERS and MORAN have with

Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida Holdings

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-10-05

Citation: 645 So. 2d 490, 1994 WL 534950

Snippet: Inc. and Count V alleged a Violation of Section 772.103(4), Florida Statutes against Mr. Ginsberg and MLG

Coffey v. Evans Properties, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-10-03

Citation: 585 So. 2d 960, 1991 WL 147682

Snippet: substances, as well as a theory under section 772.103, Florida Statutes (1989), alleging that agents

Accent Homes, Inc. v. Narco Realty, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-11

Citation: 566 So. 2d 5, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4971, 1990 WL 95374

Snippet: counts one, two, three, four and seven. See §§ 772.103, 772.104, Fla.Stat.; A.S.J. Drugs, Inc. v. Berkowitz

Ziccardi v. Strother

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-05-18

Citation: 570 So. 2d 1319, 1990 WL 66204

Snippet: reason of any violation of the provisions of s. 772.103 shall have a cause of action for threefold the

Mantooth v. Richards

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-28

Citation: 557 So. 2d 646, 1990 WL 17503

Snippet: under authority of sections 772.102(1)(a)(12), 772.103, 772.104 and 787.01, Florida Statutes (1987). We

Bass v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-12-01

Citation: 516 So. 2d 1011, 1987 WL 2005

Snippet: criminal extortions, see §§ 772.102(1)(a)(22), 772.103, 772.104, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1986), are inapplicable

Shouten v. Utah International, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-11-12

Citation: 515 So. 2d 366, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2613, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10975

Snippet: Florida Statutes, section 895.03 (1985), or section 772.103, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986). REVERSED. LETTS