Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 810.061 (2025)
Impairing or impeding telephone or power to a dwelling; facilitating or furthering a burglary; penalty.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
810.061 Impairing or impeding telephone or power to a dwelling; facilitating or furthering a burglary; penalty.—
(1) As used in this section, the term “burglary” has the meaning ascribed in s. 810.02(1)(b).
(2) A person who, for the purpose of facilitating or furthering the commission or attempted commission of a burglary of a dwelling by any person, damages a wire or line that transmits or conveys telephone or power to that dwelling, impairs any other equipment necessary for telephone or power transmission or conveyance, or otherwise impairs or impedes such telephone or power transmission or conveyance commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 810.061
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§810.061(2)BURGLIMPAIR DWELLING PHONE POWER FURTHER BURGLARY
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2007–2018 · leading case: Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-No. 2005-1, 953 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2007).
Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-No. 2005-1, 953 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2007). “21 IMPAIRING OR IMPEDING TELEPHONE OR POWER TO A DWELLING TO FACILITATE OR FURTHER A BURGLARY § 810.061, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Impairing or Impeding Telephone or Power to a Dwelling to Facilitate or Further a Burglary, the State must prove the following two elements…”
In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2018-05., 257 So. 3d 925 (Fla. 2018). “21 IMPAIRING OR IMPEDING TELEPHONE OR POWER TO A DWELLING TO FACILITATE OR FURTHER A BURGLARY § 810.061, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Impairing or Impeding Telephone or Power to a Dwelling to Facilitate or Further a Burglary, the State must prove the following two elements…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.