O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-11-304 (2019)

Applicability of Title 24; privileges

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in this Code section, hearings to terminate parental rights shall be conducted in accordance with Title 24. Testimony or other evidence relevant to determining whether a statutory ground for termination of parental rights exists may not be excluded on any ground of privilege, except in the case of:

(1) Communications between a party and his or her attorney; and

(2) Confessions or communications between a priest, rabbi, or duly ordained minister or similar functionary and his or her confidential communicant.

History

Code 1981, § 15-11-304, enacted by Ga. L. 2014, p. 780, § 1-22/SB 364.

T.15, C.11, A.4, P.5

PART 5 GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS

Annotations

Effective date. - This Code section became effective April 28, 2014.

- - - - - - - - - -

PART 5 GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: In the Interest of L - M. C. L., Child. (mother), 869 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).
In the Interest of L - M. C. L., Child. (mother), 869 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 15-11-304. 13 make the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness or by certification that complies with paragraph (11) or (12) of Code Section 24-9-902 or by any other statute permitting…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.