O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-70-21 (2019)

Deadline date for implementation agreement

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each county and municipality shall execute an agreement for the implementation of a local government service delivery strategy as set forth in this article by July 1, 1999.

History

Code 1981, § 36-70-21, enacted by Ga. L. 1997, p. 1567, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2020 · leading case: City of Union Point v. Greene Cnty., 812 S.E.2d 278 (Ga. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Union Point v. Greene Cnty., 812 S.E.2d 278 (Ga. 2018). · cites it 2× “The SDS Act prescribes a process for developing a local government service agreement, OCGA § 36-70-21, its required components, OCGA § 36-70-23, and criteria for its development, OCGA § 36-70-24.”

City of Union Point v. Greene Cnty. (& Vice Versa), 303 Ga. 449 (Ga. 2018). · cites it 2× “The SDS Act prescribes a process for developing a local government service agreement, OCGA § 36-70-21, its required components, OCGA § 36-70-23, and criteria for its development, OCGA § 36-70-24.”

City of Norcross v. Gwinnett Cnty., Georgia (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 10× ““The SDS Act prescribes a process for developing a local government service agreement, OCGA § 36-70-21, its required components, OCGA § 36-70-23, and criteria for its development, OCGA § 36-70-24.”

Alcovy Shores Water & Sewerage Auth. v. Jasper Cnty., 626 S.E.2d 560 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “” OCGA § 36-70-21. As a part of the implementation of the service delivery strategy, the Act instructed the counties and municipalities (1) to identify all local government services presently provided therein, and (2) to designate which local government or authority would…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.