§710-1026 Resisting arrest. (1) A
person commits the offense of resisting arrest if the person intentionally
prevents a law enforcement officer acting under color of the law enforcement
officer's official authority from effecting an arrest by:
(a) Using or threatening to use physical force
against the law enforcement officer or another; or
(b) Using any other means creating a substantial
risk of causing bodily injury to the law enforcement officer or another.
(2) Resisting arrest is a misdemeanor. [L
1972, c 9, pt of §1; gen ch 1993; am L 2001, c 91, §4]
COMMENTARY ON §710-1026
Resisting arrest is one of the commonest forms of obstructing
government operation. The Code deals specifically with resisting arrest out of
a desire to confine the offense to forcible resistance that involves some
substantial danger to the person. Mere non-submission ought not to be an
offense. One who runs away from an arresting officer or who makes an effort to
shake off the officer's detaining arm might be said to obstruct the officer
physically,[1] but this type of evasion or minor scuffling is not unusual in an
arrest, nor would it be desirable to make it a criminal offense to flee
arrest. In this case the proper social course is to authorize police pursuit
and use of reasonable force to effect the arrest. If the actor is captured,
the actor may be convicted of the underlying offense. If conviction cannot be
had, it would be a grave injustice to permit prosecution for an unsuccessful
effort, by an innocent person, to evade the police.[2]
Note that the arrest may be either of the actor or of a third
person: the social and individual harms involved are the same in either case.
Moreover, it is no defense to a charge under this section that the officer was
making an unlawful arrest, provided the officer was acting under color of law.
American jurisdictions have almost universally rejected the common-law doctrine
that it is permissible to resist an unlawful arrest with as much force as one
has at one's disposal. In a well-ordered society, the evils involved in
allowing such resistance far outweigh the infrequent and usually minor
inconvenience of submitting to any arrest made under color of law and disputing
it within the legal framework. The requirement that the arrest be made under
color of the officer's official authority obviates the necessity for a separate
section barring such a defense.
The previous Hawaii law penalizing interference with an
arresting police officer was similar to this section of the Code, except that
the former law did not require the use of force or the risking of bodily
injury. The penalties are roughly the same.[3]
Cases of interference which do not involve force or risk of
bodily injury, but which present serious social dangers are included under
§§710-1029 and 1030 as cases of hindering prosecution. This section of the
Code is in accord with the Model Penal Code and with most recent state
revisions in both definition and penalty.[4]
Case Notes
Resisting arrest statute not applicable where defendant's
arrest was complete and defendant was in custody before fleeing police. 72 H.
360, 817 P.2d 1060 (1991).
Statutory references in oral charge did not cure the omission
of essential elements in resisting arrest and assault against a police officer
counts of the charge. 77 H. 309, 884 P.2d 372 (1994).
Mentioned: 9 H. App. 315, 837 P.2d 1313 (1992).
__________
§710-1026 Commentary:
1. But see, §710-1010(2)(a) which limits §710-1010
(obstructing government operations) to non-arrest situations.
2. M.P.C., Tentative Draft No. 8, comments at 128-29 (1958).
3. H.R.S. §740-11.
4. M.P.C. §242.2; Prop. Mich. Rev. Cr. Code §4625; Prop. Pa.
Cr. Code §2205.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
35
cases (
6 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case:
State v. Line, 214 P.3d 613 (Haw. 2009).
State v. Line, 214 P.3d 613 (Haw. 2009).
· cites it 24× “Kachanian held that, although the initial seizure of the appellant and his subsequent arrest were illegal, “such illegality would not affect the ‘resisting arrest’ charge under HRS § 710-1026.” 11 78 Hawai'i at 485 , 896 P.”
State v. Nesmith, 276 P.3d 617 (Haw. 2012).
· cites it 10× “2d 372, 373 (1994), the defendant was charged, inter alia, with resisting arrest in violation of HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985). [6] The defendant was orally charged as follows: On or about the 28th day of June, 1991 in Kona, County and State of Hawai`i, [the defendant] attempted…”
State v. Kachanian, 896 P.2d 931 (Haw. App. 1995).
· cites it 24× “That is because under HRS § 710-1026, "it is no defense to [the crime of resisting arrest] .”
State v. Hitchcock, 235 P.3d 365 (Haw. 2010).
· cites it 8× “In Elliott , the defendant had been convicted of (1) resisting arrest in violation of HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985), [4] (2) assault against a police officer in violation of HRS § 707-712.”
State v. Tominiko, 266 P.3d 1122 (Haw. 2011).
· cites it 4× “In Elliot , Elliot was orally charged on three separate counts: (1) resisting arrest, HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985), [9] (2) assault against a police officer, HRS § 707-712.”
State v. Womack, 847 P.2d 609 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 4× “Our current resisting arrest statute was derived from Haw. Rev. Stat. § 710-1026 . Rudolph J. Gerber, Criminal Law of Arizona § 13-2508, at 357 (1978).”
State v. Harter., 340 P.3d 440 (Haw. 2014).
· cites it 4× “HRS § 710-1026, Resisting arrest, in relevant part, provides the following: (1) A person commits the offense of resisting arrest if the person intentionally prevents a law enforcement officer acting under color of the law enforcement officer’s official authority from effecting…”
State v. Wiegmann, 714 A.2d 841 (Md. 1998).
· cites it 2× “); Haw.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 710-1026 (1993); 111.”
State v. Elliott, 884 P.2d 372 (Haw. 1994).
· cites it 2× “Petitioner-Appellant Marian Lois Elliott was convicted of resisting arrest in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 710-1026(l)(a) (1985), assault against a police officer in violation of HRS § 707-712.”
State v. Nakoa, 817 P.2d 1060 (Haw. 1991).
· cites it 4× “The resisting arrest statute, HRS § 710-1026, states in pertinent part: *367 (1) A person commits the offense of resisting arrest if he intentionally prevents a peace officer acting under color of his official authority from effecting an arrest by: (a) Using or threatening to…”
State v. Kealoha., 414 P.3d 98 (Haw. 2018).
· cites it 2× “12-1-387, Kealoha was charged with one count of each of the following: Unauthorized Control of a Propelled Vehicle in violation of HRS § 708-836, Promoting a Dangerous Drug in the Third Degree in violation of HRS § 712-1246, Promoting a Detrimental Drug in the Third Degree in…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 710-1026(1) — 6 cases
State v. Kachanian, 896 P.2d 931 (Haw. App. 1995).
“That is because under HRS § 710-1026, "it is no defense to [the crime of resisting arrest] .”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 710-1026(1)(a) — 12 cases
State v. Nesmith, 276 P.3d 617 (Haw. 2012).
“2d 372, 373 (1994), the defendant was charged, inter alia, with resisting arrest in violation of HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985). [6] The defendant was orally charged as follows: On or about the 28th day of June, 1991 in Kona, County and State of Hawai`i, [the defendant] attempted…”
State v. Hitchcock, 235 P.3d 365 (Haw. 2010).
“In Elliott , the defendant had been convicted of (1) resisting arrest in violation of HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985), [4] (2) assault against a police officer in violation of HRS § 707-712.”
State v. Kealoha., 414 P.3d 98 (Haw. 2018).
“12-1-387, Kealoha was charged with one count of each of the following: Unauthorized Control of a Propelled Vehicle in violation of HRS § 708-836, Promoting a Dangerous Drug in the Third Degree in violation of HRS § 712-1246, Promoting a Detrimental Drug in the Third Degree in…”
State v. Tominiko, 266 P.3d 1122 (Haw. 2011).
“In Elliot , Elliot was orally charged on three separate counts: (1) resisting arrest, HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985), [9] (2) assault against a police officer, HRS § 707-712.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 710-1026(2) — 1 case
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 710-1026(a) — 1 case
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 710-1026(l)(a) — 10 cases
State v. Nesmith, 276 P.3d 617 (Haw. 2012).
“2d 372, 373 (1994), the defendant was charged, inter alia, with resisting arrest in violation of HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985). [6] The defendant was orally charged as follows: On or about the 28th day of June, 1991 in Kona, County and State of Hawai`i, [the defendant] attempted…”
State v. Elliott, 884 P.2d 372 (Haw. 1994).
“Petitioner-Appellant Marian Lois Elliott was convicted of resisting arrest in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 710-1026(l)(a) (1985), assault against a police officer in violation of HRS § 707-712.”
State v. Tominiko, 266 P.3d 1122 (Haw. 2011).
“In Elliot , Elliot was orally charged on three separate counts: (1) resisting arrest, HRS § 710-1026(1)(a) (1985), [9] (2) assault against a police officer, HRS § 707-712.”
State v. Harter., 340 P.3d 440 (Haw. 2014).
“HRS § 710-1026, Resisting arrest, in relevant part, provides the following: (1) A person commits the offense of resisting arrest if the person intentionally prevents a law enforcement officer acting under color of the law enforcement officer’s official authority from effecting…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.