Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 6-1004 (2026)

Advisory decisions of panel. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Advisory decisions of panel. 

At the close of proceedings the panel, by majority and minority reports or by unanimous report, as the case may be, shall provide the parties its comments and observations with respect to the dispute, indicating whether the matter appears to be frivolous, meritorious or of any other particular description. If the panel is unanimous with respect to an amount of money in damages that in its opinion should fairly be offered or accepted in settlement, it may so advise the parties and affected insurers or third-party payors having subrogation, indemnity or other interest in the matter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: James v. Buck, 727 P.2d 1136 (Idaho 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
James v. Buck, 727 P.2d 1136 (Idaho 1986). · cites it 8× “" I.C. § 6-1004. The proceedings before the prelitigation panel are "informal": Proceedings conducted or maintained under the authority of this act shall at all times be confidential, privileged and immune from civil process and evidence of them or results, findings or…”
Moss v. Bjornson, 765 P.2d 676 (Idaho 1988). · cites it 6× “[2] Idaho Code § 6-1004 provides in pertinent part: Advisory decisions of panel.”
Moss v. Bjornson, 765 P.2d 676 (Idaho 1988). · cites it 6× “Idaho Code § 6-1004 provides in pertinent part: Advisory decisions of panel.”
Taylor v. Chamberlain, D.O., 302 P.3d 35 (Idaho 2013). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 6-1004. The panel appointed regarding the alleged malpractice in this case conducted its proceedings and then issued its report on April 19,2011.”
Wiseman v. Rencher, 553 P.3d 948 (Idaho 2024). · cites it 2× “See I.C. § 6-1004; I.C. § 6-1001. There is no record of the proceedings, and all evidence is returned to the parties upon completion of the prelitigation hearing process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.