Illinois Compiled Statutes

750 ILCS 60/218 (2026)

30-Day interim order of protection

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 60/218) (from Ch. 40, par. 2312-18)
    Sec. 218. 30-Day interim order of protection.
    (a) Prerequisites. An interim order of protection shall issue if petitioner has served notice of the hearing for that order on respondent, in accordance with Section 211, and satisfies the requirements of this subsection for one or more of the requested remedies. For each remedy requested, petitioner shall establish that:
        (1) The court has jurisdiction under Section 208;
        (2) The requirements of Section 214 are satisfied;
    
and
        (3) A general appearance was made or filed by or for
    
respondent; or process was served on respondent in the manner required by Section 210; or the petitioner is diligently attempting to complete the required service of process.
    An interim order may not include the counseling, payment of support or monetary compensation remedies, unless the respondent has filed a general appearance or has been personally served.
    (b) Appearance by respondent. If respondent appears in court for this hearing for an interim order, he or she may elect to file a general appearance and testify. Any resulting order may be an interim order, governed by this Section. Notwithstanding the requirements of this Section, if all requirements of Section 219 have been met, the Court may issue a plenary order of protection.
(Source: P.A. 87-1186.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: Scheider v. Ackerman, 860 N.E.2d 1140 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
Scheider v. Ackerman, 860 N.E.2d 1140 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “Respondent asserts that section 218 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 (Act) (750 ILCS 60/218 (West 2004)), concerning interim orders of protection, shows that jurisdiction lapses with the lapse of an interim order.”
Lutz v. Lutz, 728 N.E.2d 1234 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “The Act (750 ILCS 60/101 through 401 (West 1998)) provides for entry of (1) an emergency order of protection (750 ILCS 60/217 (West 1998)), (2) a 30-day interim order of protection (750 ILCS 60/ 218 (West 1998)), and (3) a plenary order of protection (750 ILCS 60/ 219 (West…”
Graham v. Van Rengen, 2024 IL App (2d) 230611 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “The Act provides for three types of orders of protection: emergency (750 ILCS 60/217 (West 2020)), interim (750 ILCS 60/218 (West 2020)), and plenary (750 ILCS 60/219 (West 2020)).”
In re Marriage of Goodman, 2020 IL App (2d) 200289-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “Section 219 of the Domestic Violence Act provides that a plenary order of protection, the type involved here, “shall issue” if the petitioner has, among other things, satisfied the requirements of section 214 of the Domestic Violence Act.”
Shawnna S.W. v. Eric D.W., 2023 IL App (4th) 220852-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “¶ 52 The Act provides for the entry of (1) an emergency order of protection (750 ILCS 60/217 (West 2020)), (2) a 30-day interim order of protection (750 ILCS 60/218 (West 2020)), and (3) a plenary order of protection lasting up to two years (750 ILCS 60/219 (West 2020)).”
Bautista v. Tellez, 2025 IL App (1st) 240687-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “¶ 79 Challenges to the Trial Court’s Findings ¶ 80 We will first address respondent’s challenges to the trial court’s findings of abuse within the meaning of the Domestic Violence Act of 1986 (Act). 750 ILCS 60/101 et seq.”
Lutz v. Lutz (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “The Act (750 ILCS 60/101 through 401 (West 1998)) provides for entry of (1) an emergency order of protection ((750 ILCS 60/217 (West 1998)), (2) a 30-day interim order of protec tion (750 ILCS 60/218 (West 1998)), and (3) a plenary order of protection (750 ILCS 60/219 (West…”
— 750 ILCS 60/218(a)(l) — 1 case
Scheider v. Ackerman, 860 N.E.2d 1140 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “Respondent asserts that section 218 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 (Act) (750 ILCS 60/218 (West 2004)), concerning interim orders of protection, shows that jurisdiction lapses with the lapse of an interim order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.