K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4603d (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4603d.

History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 238; L. 1993, ch. 165, § 1; L. 1994, ch. 21, § 2; L. 1994, ch. 348, § 10; L. 1995, ch. 121, § 1; L. 1995, ch. 257, § 1; L. 1996, ch. 195, § 2; L. 1997, ch. 34, § 1; L. 1997, ch. 181, § 18; L. 1998, ch. 186, § 2; L. 1999, ch. 164, § 13; L. 2000, ch. 182, § 3; L. 2001, ch. 177, § 8; L. 2002, ch. 19, § 2; L. 2003, ch. 135, § 3; L. 2005, ch. 150, § 5; L. 2006, ch. 149, § 7; L. 2007, ch. 198, § 4; L. 2009, ch. 132, § 8; L. 2010, ch. 41, § 1; L. 2011, ch. 46, § 1; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 91, § 41; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 149 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2024 · leading case: State v. King, 204 P.3d 585 (Kan. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. King, 204 P.3d 585 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 14× “We granted King’s petition for review on this issue and on a question involving the requirements for ordering restitution pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4603d(b)(1). In granting King’s review on the Doyle issue, we requested and the parties filed supplemental briefing on the following…”
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 86× “In arguing that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under subsection (f)(3) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, Casey cites to subsection (n) of K.”
State v. Martin, 17 P.3d 344 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 32× “Therefore, K.S.A. 1997 Supp. 21-4603d applies to this case.”
State v. Bonner, 227 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2010). · cites it 34× “(K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4603d applied to the forgery crimes, which were committed in 2005.”
State v. Beard, 49 P.3d 492 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 30× “” K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4603d(a) provides in part: “Prior to .”
State v. Hall, 319 P.3d 506 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 12× “First, he argued that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to impose restitution after the first hearing.”
State v. Bee, 207 P.3d 244 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 18× ““(2) Offenders who are discharged from such program shall be subject to the revocation provisions of subsection (n) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, and amendments thereto.” K.”
State v. Andelt, 217 P.3d 976 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 31× “21-4729 and K.S.A. 21-4603d Resolution of this case turns on our interpretation of three statutory provisions: K.”
State v. Preston, 195 P.3d 240 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 17× “Acknowledging that K.S.A. 21-4603d(n) specifically precludes jail time credit for participation in the certified drug abuse treatment program mandated by K.”
State v. Arculeo, 933 P.2d 122 (Kan. 1997). · cites it 23× “Relying on K.S.A. 21-4603d, the trial court construed the defendant’s multiple appearance bonds pending sentencing to be a conditional release.”
State v. Wiegand, 69 P.3d 627 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 12× “21-4603d] and there are no community intermediate sanction centers within the meaning of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4603d (nor any of its preceding versions) operating at this time in the State of Kansas.”
State v. Post, 112 P.3d 116 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 11× “Post asserts that the sentencing statute, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-4603d(a), does not authorize a district court to include a no-contact order as a condition of incarceration.”
Show all 149 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(2) — 1 case
State v. Hall, 247 P.3d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(4) — 1 case
State v. Baldwin, 150 P.3d 325 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(5) — 1 case
State v. Bricker, 252 P.3d 118 (Kan. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a) — 39 cases
State v. Post, 112 P.3d 116 (Kan. 2005). “Post asserts that the sentencing statute, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-4603d(a), does not authorize a district court to include a no-contact order as a condition of incarceration.”
State v. Beard, 49 P.3d 492 (Kan. 2002). “” K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4603d(a) provides in part: “Prior to .”
State v. Plotner, 235 P.3d 417 (Kan. 2010).
State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021).
State v. Bowen, 323 P.3d 853 (Kan. 2014).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(1) — 4 cases
State v. Post, 112 P.3d 116 (Kan. 2005). “Post asserts that the sentencing statute, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-4603d(a), does not authorize a district court to include a no-contact order as a condition of incarceration.”
State v. Huff, 71 P.3d 1185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Lm, 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In Re Prg, 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(10) — 1 case
State v. Billington, 953 P.2d 1059 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(11) — 3 cases
State v. Post, 112 P.3d 116 (Kan. 2005). “Post asserts that the sentencing statute, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-4603d(a), does not authorize a district court to include a no-contact order as a condition of incarceration.”
State v. Vaughn, 472 P.3d 1139 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Owens, 67 P.3d 164 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(2) — 3 cases
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
In Re Lm, 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In Re Prg, 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(3) — 7 cases
State v. Post, 112 P.3d 116 (Kan. 2005). “Post asserts that the sentencing statute, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-4603d(a), does not authorize a district court to include a no-contact order as a condition of incarceration.”
State v. Cox, 42 P.3d 182 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Hymer, 11 P.3d 94 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Petz, 7 P.3d 1277 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Post, 96 P.3d 662 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(4) — 2 cases
State v. Cooper, 977 P.2d 960 (Kan. 1999).
State v. Perry-Coutcher, 254 P.3d 556 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(5) — 4 cases
State v. Baldwin, 150 P.3d 325 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Bonner, 227 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2010). “(K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4603d applied to the forgery crimes, which were committed in 2005.”
State v. Johnson, 211 P.3d 861 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Garcia, 64 P.3d 465 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(6) — 1 case
State v. Schad, 206 P.3d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(7) — 4 cases
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
In Re Lm, 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In Re Prg, 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(8) — 4 cases
State v. Durham, 172 P.3d 88 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
Tonge v. Simmons, 11 P.3d 77 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
Puckett v. Bruce, 73 P.3d 736 (Kan. 2003).
State v. Robards, 78 P.3d 825 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(9) — 3 cases
State v. Phillips, 210 P.3d 93 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Raschke, 219 P.3d 481 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Cernech, 924 P.2d 648 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(l) — 9 cases
State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004).
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
State v. Jackson, 238 P.3d 246 (Kan. 2010).
State v. Morris, 319 P.3d 539 (Kan. 2014).
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(a)(ll) — 4 cases
State v. Plotner, 235 P.3d 417 (Kan. 2010).
State v. Allen, 20 P.3d 747 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).
Puckett v. Bruce, 73 P.3d 736 (Kan. 2003).
State v. Post, 96 P.3d 662 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(b) — 3 cases
Iron Horse Auto, Inc. v. Lititz Mut. Ins., 156 P.3d 1221 (Kan. 2007).
State v. Alderson, 322 P.3d 364 (Kan. 2014).
Puckett v. Bruce, 73 P.3d 736 (Kan. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(b)(1) — 6 cases
State v. King, 204 P.3d 585 (Kan. 2009). “We granted King’s petition for review on this issue and on a question involving the requirements for ordering restitution pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4603d(b)(1). In granting King’s review on the Doyle issue, we requested and the parties filed supplemental briefing on the following…”
State v. Herron, 335 P.3d 1211 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Huff, 336 P.3d 397 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Cox, 42 P.3d 182 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Andelt, 195 P.3d 1220 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Dwyer, 439 P.3d 338 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(b)(8) — 1 case
State v. Durham, 172 P.3d 88 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(b)(l) — 12 cases
State v. Hall, 319 P.3d 506 (Kan. 2014). “First, he argued that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to impose restitution after the first hearing.”
State v. Goeller, 77 P.3d 1272 (Kan. 2003).
State v. King, 204 P.3d 585 (Kan. 2009). “We granted King’s petition for review on this issue and on a question involving the requirements for ordering restitution pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4603d(b)(1). In granting King’s review on the Doyle issue, we requested and the parties filed supplemental briefing on the following…”
State v. Hall, 247 P.3d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. McDaniel, 254 P.3d 534 (Kan. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(c) — 2 cases
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “In arguing that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under subsection (f)(3) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, Casey cites to subsection (n) of K.”
State v. Andelt, 195 P.3d 1220 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(d) — 4 cases
State v. Robinson, 132 P.3d 934 (Kan. 2006).
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “In arguing that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under subsection (f)(3) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, Casey cites to subsection (n) of K.”
State v. Andelt, 195 P.3d 1220 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Dyer, 108 P.3d 1010 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(e) — 7 cases
State v. Martin, 17 P.3d 344 (Kan. 2001). “Therefore, K.S.A. 1997 Supp. 21-4603d applies to this case.”
State v. Beard, 49 P.3d 492 (Kan. 2002). “” K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4603d(a) provides in part: “Prior to .”
State v. Agosto, 27 P.3d 423 (Kan. 2001).
State v. Moody, 38 P.3d 659 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Bryant, 163 P.3d 325 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(f) — 24 cases
State v. Garcia, 56 P.3d 797 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Bonner, 227 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2010). “(K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4603d applied to the forgery crimes, which were committed in 2005.”
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “In arguing that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under subsection (f)(3) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, Casey cites to subsection (n) of K.”
State v. Quested, 352 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2015).
State v. Carr, 53 P.3d 843 (Kan. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(f)(1) — 3 cases
State v. Sims, 190 P.3d 271 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Funk, 349 P.3d 1230 (Kan. 2015).
State v. Andelt, 195 P.3d 1220 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(f)(3) — 3 cases
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “In arguing that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under subsection (f)(3) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, Casey cites to subsection (n) of K.”
State v. Cato-Perry, 332 P.3d 191 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Lackey, 246 P.3d 998 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(f)(l) — 4 cases
State v. Andelt, 217 P.3d 976 (Kan. 2009). “21-4729 and K.S.A. 21-4603d Resolution of this case turns on our interpretation of three statutory provisions: K.”
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “In arguing that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under subsection (f)(3) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, Casey cites to subsection (n) of K.”
State v. Crawford, 185 P.3d 315 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Dale, 220 P.3d 1102 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(g) — 13 cases
State v. Bonner, 227 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2010). “(K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4603d applied to the forgery crimes, which were committed in 2005.”
State v. Wiegand, 69 P.3d 627 (Kan. 2003). “21-4603d] and there are no community intermediate sanction centers within the meaning of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4603d (nor any of its preceding versions) operating at this time in the State of Kansas.”
State v. Bee, 207 P.3d 244 (Kan. 2009). ““(2) Offenders who are discharged from such program shall be subject to the revocation provisions of subsection (n) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, and amendments thereto.” K.”
In re E.F., 205 P.3d 787 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Bee, 179 P.3d 466 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(i) — 11 cases
State v. Stevens, 172 P.3d 570 (Kan. 2007).
State v. Phillips, 210 P.3d 93 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Stevens, 138 P.3d 1262 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
State v. Raschke, 219 P.3d 481 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Roberts, 461 P.3d 77 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020).
— K.S.A. § 21-4603d(n) — 9 cases
State v. Casey, 211 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “In arguing that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under subsection (f)(3) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, Casey cites to subsection (n) of K.”
State v. Preston, 195 P.3d 240 (Kan. 2008). “Acknowledging that K.S.A. 21-4603d(n) specifically precludes jail time credit for participation in the certified drug abuse treatment program mandated by K.”
State v. Bee, 207 P.3d 244 (Kan. 2009). ““(2) Offenders who are discharged from such program shall be subject to the revocation provisions of subsection (n) of K.S.A. 21-4603d, and amendments thereto.” K.”
State v. Andelt, 217 P.3d 976 (Kan. 2009). “21-4729 and K.S.A. 21-4603d Resolution of this case turns on our interpretation of three statutory provisions: K.”
State v. Hopkins, 285 P.3d 1021 (Kan. 2012).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.