Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4608 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4608.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4608; L. 1978, ch. 120, § 8; L. 1982, ch. 150, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 111, § 1; L. 1985, ch. 111, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 123, § 9; L. 1987, ch. 113, § 1; L. 1989, ch. 92, § 24; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 243; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 272; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 47; L. 2008, ch. 183, § 3; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 174 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1971–2026 · leading case: State v. Quested, 352 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Quested, 352 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2015). · cites it 74× “21-4720 states: "(a) The provisions of subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (h) of K.S.A. 21-4608 and amendments thereto regarding multiple sentences shall apply to the sentencing of offenders for crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993, pursuant to the sentencing…”

State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004). · cites it 21× “However, when the provisions of K.S.A. 21-4608 are considered in context of the Code, those Kansas statutes defining misdemeanor crimes outside the Code, and in the light of Kansas case law, the conclusion that K.”

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 24× “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

State v. Dunham, 472 P.3d 604 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 14× “The legislature at the 1982 session enacted what is now K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-4608 to require mandatory consecutive sentences in certain cases.”

Martin v. Kansas Parole Bd., 255 P.3d 9 (Kan. 2011). · cites it 23× “Shortly after his release, the Kansas Legislature passed an amendment to K.S.A. 21-4608, which impacted Martin’s previously imposed postrelease expiration date by extending it nearly 11 years.”

Hudson v. State, 42 P.3d 150 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 19× “: Pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5), petitioner Shelia' Hudson received no credit for time spent on parole on the aggregate sentence imposed when she committed a new offense while on parole.”

Love v. State, 124 P.3d 32 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 13× “a) (now [f]) provided: “When a new felony is committed while the offender is incarcerated and serving a sentence for a felony or while the offender is on probation, assignment to a community correctional services program, parole, conditional release, or post-release supervision…”

State v. Reed, 703 P.2d 756 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 18× “Prior to 1982, K.S.A. 21-4608 covered the subject of multiple sentences, including the imposition of concurrent and consecutive sentences.”

Oregon v. Ice, 555 U.S. 160 (2009). · cites it 2× “16 (2007)); Kansas ( Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4608 (2007));Mississippi (Miss.”

State v. Mitchell, 162 P.3d 18 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 5× “21-4608 when the district court is sentencing habitual offenders.”

State v. Taylor, 319 P.3d 1256 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 6× “We remand for the district court to determine whether Taylor was on release in 87 CR 412 when the crimes in this case were committed and whether K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-4608(4) applied. And based on that determination, the district court may have to conduct further proceedings as…”

Thomas v. Hannigan, 6 P.3d 933 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 18× “" The trial court denied the State's motion to alter, amend, or vacate judgment, which alleged the effect of amendments to K.S.A. 21-4608 did not result in an ex post facto application of the law.”

Show all 174 citing cases →

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(1) — 27 cases

State v. Dunham, 472 P.3d 604 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “The legislature at the 1982 session enacted what is now K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-4608 to require mandatory consecutive sentences in certain cases.”

State v. Royse, 845 P.2d 44 (Kan. 1993).

State v. Adkins, 689 P.2d 880 (Kan. 1984).

State v. Mitchell, 162 P.3d 18 (Kan. 2007). “21-4608 when the district court is sentencing habitual offenders.”

State v. Howard, 198 P.3d 146 (Kan. 2008).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(1)(5) — 1 case

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(2) — 4 cases

State v. Quested, 352 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2015). “21-4720 states: "(a) The provisions of subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (h) of K.S.A. 21-4608 and amendments thereto regarding multiple sentences shall apply to the sentencing of offenders for crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993, pursuant to the sentencing…”

State v. Bell, 631 P.2d 254 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981).

State v. Turner (Kan. Ct. App. 2026).

State v. Swafford – Johnson – Affirmed – Saline (Kan. 2017).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(3) — 20 cases

State v. Keeler, 710 P.2d 1279 (Kan. 1985).

Love v. State, 124 P.3d 32 (Kan. 2005). “a) (now [f]) provided: “When a new felony is committed while the offender is incarcerated and serving a sentence for a felony or while the offender is on probation, assignment to a community correctional services program, parole, conditional release, or post-release supervision…”

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

State v. Ashley, 693 P.2d 1168 (Kan. 1985).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(3)(e) — 2 cases

Thomas v. Hannigan, 6 P.3d 933 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “" The trial court denied the State's motion to alter, amend, or vacate judgment, which alleged the effect of amendments to K.S.A. 21-4608 did not result in an ex post facto application of the law.”

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(4) — 11 cases

State v. Taylor, 319 P.3d 1256 (Kan. 2014). “We remand for the district court to determine whether Taylor was on release in 87 CR 412 when the crimes in this case were committed and whether K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-4608(4) applied. And based on that determination, the district court may have to conduct further proceedings as…”

State v. Reed, 703 P.2d 756 (Kan. 1985). “Prior to 1982, K.S.A. 21-4608 covered the subject of multiple sentences, including the imposition of concurrent and consecutive sentences.”

State v. Daniels, 853 P.2d 65 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).

State v. Owens, 875 P.2d 1007 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(5) — 6 cases

State v. Hutchison, 615 P.2d 138 (Kan. 1980).

State v. Henning, 599 P.2d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).

State v. Reed, 703 P.2d 756 (Kan. 1985). “Prior to 1982, K.S.A. 21-4608 covered the subject of multiple sentences, including the imposition of concurrent and consecutive sentences.”

State v. Sylva, 795 P.2d 947 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(6) — 2 cases

State v. Jenkins, 690 P.2d 396 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984).

State v. King, 793 P.2d 1267 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(6)(a) — 2 cases

State v. Richard, 681 P.2d 612 (Kan. 1984).

State v. McCloud, 883 P.2d 775 (Kan. 1994).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(6)(c) — 1 case

Turner (ID 56006) v. Peterson (D. Kan. 2021).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(6)(d) — 5 cases

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

State v. Williams, 856 P.2d 158 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).

State v. Fowler, 710 P.2d 1268 (Kan. 1985).

State v. Palmer, 942 P.2d 19 (Kan. 1997).

State v. Jenkins, 690 P.2d 396 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(6)(e) — 4 cases

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

State v. Keeler, 710 P.2d 1279 (Kan. 1985).

State v. Williams, 856 P.2d 158 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(7) — 1 case

State v. Daniels, 853 P.2d 65 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(8) — 3 cases

State v. Aleman, 830 P.2d 64 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).

State v. Tillman, 858 P.2d 1219 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).

State v. Manning, 947 P.2d 452 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(a) — 27 cases

State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004). “However, when the provisions of K.S.A. 21-4608 are considered in context of the Code, those Kansas statutes defining misdemeanor crimes outside the Code, and in the light of Kansas case law, the conclusion that K.”

State v. Jackson, 936 P.2d 761 (Kan. 1997).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(b) — 2 cases

State v. Beard, 49 P.3d 492 (Kan. 2002).

State v. Dillard, 890 P.2d 1248 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(c) — 21 cases

State v. Hilton, 286 P.3d 871 (Kan. 2012).

State v. Hall, 195 P.3d 220 (Kan. 2008).

State v. McCallum, 895 P.2d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(d) — 10 cases

State v. Bricker, 252 P.3d 118 (Kan. 2011).

State v. Arculeo, 933 P.2d 122 (Kan. 1997).

State v. Vaughn, 472 P.3d 1139 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020).

State v. Cato-Perry, 332 P.3d 191 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014).

Wilkinson v. State, 195 P.3d 278 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(e) — 2 cases

Martin v. Kansas Parole Bd., 255 P.3d 9 (Kan. 2011). “Shortly after his release, the Kansas Legislature passed an amendment to K.S.A. 21-4608, which impacted Martin’s previously imposed postrelease expiration date by extending it nearly 11 years.”

State v. Manning, 947 P.2d 452 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(e)(2) — 4 cases

O'Quinn (ID 51835) v. Prisoner Review Bd. (D. Kan. 2025).

O'Quinn v. Zmuda (Kan. Ct. App. 2025).

O'Quinn (ID 51835) v. Prisoner Review Bd. (D. Kan. 2023).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(f) — 5 cases

Price v. State, 21 P.3d 1021 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

State v. Mebane, 91 P.3d 1175 (Kan. 2004).

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

Price v. Simmons, 71 P.3d 1164 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).

Frost v. Norwood, 437 P.3d 1034 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(f)(3) — 4 cases

Price v. State, 21 P.3d 1021 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

Price v. Simmons, 71 P.3d 1164 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).

State v. Ewing (Kan. Ct. App. 2021).

State v. Swafford – Johnson – Affirmed – Saline (Kan. 2017).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(f)(4) — 5 cases

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

Blomeyer v. State Ex Rel. Morrison, 915 P.2d 790 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).

McKinney v. State, 9 P.3d 600 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

Carnes v. Hannigan, 3 P.3d 548 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).

Smith v. McKune, 59 P.3d 1038 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(f)(5) — 3 cases

Hudson v. State, 42 P.3d 150 (Kan. 2002). “: Pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4608(f)(5), petitioner Shelia' Hudson received no credit for time spent on parole on the aggregate sentence imposed when she committed a new offense while on parole.”

Anderson v. Bruce, 50 P.3d 1 (Kan. 2002). “” Anderson points out that the same legislature that amended K.S.A. 21-4608 to deny prisoner’s credit for time spent on parole did not amend K.”

State v. Theis, 936 P.2d 710 (Kan. 1997).

— K.S.A. § 21-4608(h) — 3 cases

State v. Chronister, 903 P.2d 1345 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

State v. Manning, 947 P.2d 452 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.