K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1511 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1511.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 11; L. 1992, ch. 128, § 9; L. 1996, ch. 234, § 11; L. 2006, ch. 215, § 8; Repealed, L. 2009, ch. 116, § 27; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–2001 · leading case: In re D.D.P., 819 P.2d 1212 (Kan. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re D.D.P., 819 P.2d 1212 (Kan. 1991). · cites it 2× “A guardian ad litem or attorney appointed for parties to proceedings under, this section shall be allowed a reasonable fee for their services, which may be assessed as an expense in the proceedings as provided in K.S.A. 38-1511 and amendments thereto.” Sections (b) and (c) deal…”
Walker v. State, 988 P.2d 283 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1511(b), (c)(2). We can find no comparable statute authorizing taxation of public defender fees to the 1507 petitioner.”
In re the Adoption of D.S.D., 19 P.3d 204 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “38-1505(e); K.S.A. 38-1511(b) (providing for payment of fees for a child’s guardian ad litem or attorney appointed for parents from *689 the county’s general fund).”
In Re Ddp, Jr., 819 P.2d 1212 (Kan. 1991). · cites it 2× “A guardian ad litem or attorney appointed for parties to proceedings under this section shall be allowed a reasonable fee for their services, which may be assessed as an expense in the proceedings as provided in K.S.A. 38-1511 and amendments thereto." Sections (b) and (c) deal…”
— K.S.A. § 38-1511(b) — 2 cases
Walker v. State, 988 P.2d 283 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1511(b), (c)(2). We can find no comparable statute authorizing taxation of public defender fees to the 1507 petitioner.”
In re the Adoption of D.S.D., 19 P.3d 204 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “38-1505(e); K.S.A. 38-1511(b) (providing for payment of fees for a child’s guardian ad litem or attorney appointed for parents from *689 the county’s general fund).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.