K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1654 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1654.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 97; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 169, § 140; January 1, 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1984–2006 · leading case: State v. Hitt, 42 P.3d 732 (Kan. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hitt, 42 P.3d 732 (Kan. 2002). “38-1606; the right to have the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt, K.S.A. 38-1654; and the right to fair notice of the charges filed, K.”
Findlay v. State, 681 P.2d 20 (Kan. 1984). “K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 38-1654 imposes upon juvenile offender proceedings the same burden of proof as in criminal cases — proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
In the Interest of T.K., 731 P.2d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “The Supreme Court in Findlay took note that K.S.A. 38-1654 provides the same burden of proof in juvenile cases as in criminal matters — proof beyond a reasonable doubt — and set forth the standard for our review: “In State v.”
In re the Adoption of S.A.M., 147 P.3d 158 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “K.S.A. 38-1654; State v. Hitt, 273 Kan. 224, 232 , 42 P.”
State v. Spates, 36 P.3d 839 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “38-1653 (the rules of evidence of the code of civil procedure apply); K.S.A. 38-1654 (standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt).”
In re TK, 731 P.2d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “The Supreme Court in Findlay took note that K.S.A. 38-1654 provides the same burden of proof in juvenile cases as in criminal matters — proof beyond a reasonable doubt — and set forth the standard for our review: "In State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.