K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-3403 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-3403.

History: L. 1985, ch. 197, § 3; Repealed, L. 1988, ch. 222, § 8; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1986–1993 · leading case: Farley v. Engelken, 740 P.2d 1058 (Kan. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Farley v. Engelken, 740 P.2d 1058 (Kan. 1987). · cites it 28× “: Three interlocutory appeals in medical malpractice suits have been consolidated for a determination of the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 60-3403 (hereafter 60-3403).”
Ferguson v. Garmon, 643 F. Supp. 335 (D. Kan. 1986). · cites it 17× “First, plaintiff Polizetta *337 Ferguson has moved for a determination in advance of trial of the constitutionality of K.S.A. 60-3403. Plaintiff contends that the statute, which allows defendants who are health care providers to introduce evidence showing the amount of…”
Samsel v. Wheeler Transp. Servs., Inc., 789 P.2d 541 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 4× “tion of the 1970s had failed to halt the increasing cost of medical malpractice insurance and in response to the new crisis of the 1980s, the Kansas Legislature took the following actions in 1985: (1) a cap was placed on punitive damages in medical malpractice actions, and (2)…”
Harrier v. Gendel, 751 P.2d 1038 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 10× “During the trial of the action before a jury, the Shawnee County District Court ruled that K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 60-3403, the medical malpractice collateral source payments statute, was constitutional and permitted the introduction of evidence relating to collateral source benefits…”
Wisker ex rel. Wisker v. Hart, 766 P.2d 168 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 4× “The trial court ruled that the collateral source statute, K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 60-3403, was not constitutionally deficient and permitted evidence to be introduced of Social Security and Workers' Compensation benefits.”
Thompson v. KFB Ins., 850 P.2d 773 (Kan. 1993). “Then the legislature enacted K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 60-3403, which provided in pertinent part: “(a) In any medical malpractice liability action, evidence of the amount of reimbursement or indemnification paid or to be paid to or for the benefit of.”
Stephenson v. Sugar Creek Packing & Hartford Ins., 830 P.2d 41 (Kan. 1992). “The question in Farley was whether K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 60-3403, successor to the statute considered in Wentling, violated the equal protection clause of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution.”
Stickney v. Wesley Med. Ctr., 768 P.2d 253 (Kan. 1989). · cites it 4× “Stickney filed this lawsuit on September 26, 1985, seeking damages for injuries and other losses sustained because of the alleged malpractice of Wesley and Dr.”
Armstrong v. Goldblatt Tool Co., 747 P.2d 119 (Kan. 1987). · cites it 2× “60-3403 abrogating the collateral source rule in medical malpractice actions, violated the equal protection clause of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution by treating a limited class of tortfeasors, i.e., negligent health care providers, preferentially, and denying a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.