K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-4304 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-4304.

History: L. 1995, ch. 257, § 12; Repealed, L. 2022, ch. 31, § 6; July 1.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case: State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 3× “60-4301 through K.S.A. 60-4304, all of which make criminal restitution virtually identical to a civil judgment.”
State v. Robison, 496 P.3d 892 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 2× “60-4301 through K.S.A. 60-4304, all of which make criminal restitution virtually identical to a civil judgment.”
State v. Applegate, 976 P.2d 936 (Kan. 1999). · cites it 3× “The State concedes there is no indication that the Kansas Legislature, in enacting K.S.A. 1995 Supp. 60-4304 and K.S.A. 21-4610(d)(1), intended to allow one to exceed full compensation and reap a “windfall.”
State v. Robison, 469 P.3d 83 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “" K.S.A. 60-4304(b); Applegate, 266 Kan. at 1078-79 .”
State v. Wills (Kan. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “60-4301 through K.S.A. 60-4304) as unconstitutional. 2021 WL 4806611 , at *8.”
— K.S.A. § 60-4304(b) — 4 cases
State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021). “60-4301 through K.S.A. 60-4304, all of which make criminal restitution virtually identical to a civil judgment.”
State v. Applegate, 976 P.2d 936 (Kan. 1999). “The State concedes there is no indication that the Kansas Legislature, in enacting K.S.A. 1995 Supp. 60-4304 and K.S.A. 21-4610(d)(1), intended to allow one to exceed full compensation and reap a “windfall.”
State v. Robison, 469 P.3d 83 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “" K.S.A. 60-4304(b); Applegate, 266 Kan. at 1078-79 .”
State v. Wills (Kan. Ct. App. 2021). “60-4301 through K.S.A. 60-4304) as unconstitutional. 2021 WL 4806611 , at *8.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.