History:
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-714; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 198, § 19; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Mentioned in holding nonresident garnishee bank not subject to personal judgment under K.S.A. 60-308. Land Manufacturing, Inc. v. Highland Park State Bank, 205 Kan. 526, 528, 470 P.2d 782.
2. Cited; damage action for wrongful appointment of receiver affirmed. Braun v. Pepper, 224 Kan. 56, 57, 578 P.2d 695.
3. Cited; garnishee may stay garnishment by posting supersedeas bond equal to its liability costs and interest. Cansler v. Harrington, 231 Kan. 66, 73, 643 P.2d 110 (1982).
4. Cited; rebuttable presumption of ownership in joint accounts, damages for wrongful retention of funds discussed. Miller v. Clayco State Bank, 10 Kan. App. 2d 659, 663, 708 P.2d 997 (1985).
5. Cited; ten-day requirement in K.S.A. 60-718(c) not applicable to claim of exemptions from garnishment. Bartlett Cooperative Ass'n v. Patton, 239 Kan. 628, 629, 630, 722 P.2d 551 (1986).
6. Garnishment procedures provide that an issue of fact may be raised, calling for judgment independent of underlying cause. Smotherman v. Caswell, 755 F. Supp. 346, 349 (1990).
7. Whether federal bankruptcy rule regarding nationwide service of process superseded state process statutes examined. In re American Freight System, Inc., 173 B.R. 739, 740 (1994).
In Re Urban, 262 B.R. 865 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001). · cites it 2דK.S.A. § 60-714 describes garnishment as either an aid to attachment or “in lieu of execution.”
Bergeson v. Dilworth, 749 F. Supp. 1555 (D. Kan. 1990). · cites it 2דThe rules for Kansas garnishment proceedings are found at K.S.A. § 60-714 to -726 (1983 & Supp.1989).”
Braun v. Pepper, 578 P.2d 695 (Kan. 1978). “), garnishment (K.S.A. 60-714, et seq.), and receivership (K.”
Cansler v. Harrington, 643 P.2d 110 (Kan. 1982). “In the absence of such a stay it must be assumed appellee’s judgment will be enforced. Otherwise there would be no need for statutory procedures to stay execution; the act of appealing the judgment would be an automatic stay.”
Bartlett Coop. Ass'n v. Patton, 722 P.2d 551 (Kan. 1986). “” K.S.A. 60-714. Under K.S.A. 60-716, an order of garnishment to aid in the enforcement of a judgment may be obtained against the property of the debtor.”
In Re Stanley Station Assocs., L.P., 139 B.R. 990 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1992). · cites it 2ד), garnishment (K.S.A. 60-714 et seq.), replevin (K.S.A. 60-1005 et seq.”
Smotherman v. Caswell, 755 F. Supp. 346 (D. Kan. 1990). “Our review of the Kansas garnishment procedures, K.S.A. 60-714 et seq., and the Kansas cases indicates that the criteria are satisfied.”
Printed Media Servs. v. Solna Web, Inc., 838 F. Supp. 1453 (D. Kan. 1993). · cites it 2דpursuant to K.S.A. §§ 60-714 et seq. On May 27, 1992, Printed Media obtained a $6,688,339 judgment against Solna Web, Inc.”
Asbury v. Mauk, 687 P.2d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2דVarious questions concerning the Kansas garnishment statutes, K.S.A. 60-714 et seq., and the residential landlord and tenant act, K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.