K.S.A. » Chapter 66
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 66-118c (2026)

Same; judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

66-118c. Same; judicial review. Any action of the commission pursuant to K.S.A. 66-118b, and amendments thereto, is subject to review in accordance with the Kansas judicial review act.

History: L. 1929, ch. 220, § 3; L. 1978, ch. 265, § 2; L. 1983, ch. 221, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 318, § 117; L. 2010, ch. 17, § 173; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1958–2022 · leading case: W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 740 P.2d 585 (Kan. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 740 P.2d 585 (Kan. 1987). · cites it 6× “66-118a through K.S.A. 66-118c. K.S.A. 66-118a defines the term “party” and provides: “66-118a.”
Cities Serv. Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 440 P.2d 660 (Kan. 1968). · cites it 3× “Within due time and on July 1, 1965, Cities Service, proceeding under the statute (K.S.A. 66-118c), filed its application for judicial review in the district court of Sedgwick County, and sought an order staying the commission's order here involved.”
Midwest Gas Users Ass'n v. State Corp. Comm'n, 595 P.2d 735 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “The KCC approved the rate schedule and Midwest sought review (under the then provisions of K.S.A. 66-118c) in the district court of Jefferson County.”
Jones v. Kansas Gas & Elec. Co., 565 P.2d 597 (Kan. 1977). “Jones and Wilson then filed a petition in district court for judicial review, pursuant to K.S.A. 66-118c. Following submission of the transcript and briefs, the district court issued an order sustaining the Commission’s order of dismissal.”
Bartlett Grain Co. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 256 P.3d 867 (Kan. 2011). “77-607(a), a person is entitled to judicial review of a final agency action if the person otherwise qualifies under the KJRA regarding standing, exhaustion of administrative remedies, and the time for filing the petition for judicial review.”
Citizens' Util. Ratepayer Bd. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 284 P.3d 348 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “According to K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 66-118c, this court’s review of an order of the Commission must be in accordance with the Kansas Judicial Review Act, which begins at K.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 29 P.3d 424 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “66-118a(b), the Court of Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to review any agency action of the Commission arising from a rate hearing requested by a public utility or requested by the Commission when a public utility is a necessary party.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 629 P.2d 1174 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). “” K.S.A. 66-118c provides that a party may apply for “a court review of such order or decision” within 30 days of the denial of the rehearing or after decision on the rehearing.”
W. Resources, Inc. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 42 P.3d 162 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “Standard of Review Pursuant to K.S.A. 66-118c, this court reviews an order of the KCC under the KJRA.”
Grindsted Prods., Inc. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 937 P.2d 1 (Kan. 1997). “and K.S.A. 66-118c, claiming that (1) the KCC improperly construed the EDR contrary to principles of tariff interpretation; (2) the KCC improperly determined that public utilities have no duty to disclose available ,tariffs to customers who may be eligible for service under more…”
Pelican Transfer & Storage, Inc. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 402 P.2d 762 (Kan. 1965). · cites it 2× “) Section 66-118c provides that an applicant may appeal to the district court within thirty days after rehearing is denied or within thirty days after a decision is granted on rehearing.”
Williams Nat. Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 916 P.2d 52 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “If a party is not aggrieved by the modifications and has previously called the attention of the KCC to all of the elements of error it asserts on appeal, it should not be required to petition for reconsideration of the only new material in the order. We hold WNG has exhausted…”
Show all 27 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.