K.S.A. » Chapter 77
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 77-610 (2026)

Initiation of action; form of action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

77-610. Initiation of action; form of action. Judicial review is initiated by filing a petition for judicial review in the appropriate court and payment of the docket fee as required by K.S.A. 60-2001 and amendments thereto. A petition for judicial review may seek any type of relief available under K.S.A. 77-622 and amendments thereto. If a petition seeks any type of relief available under K.S.A. 77-622 and amendments thereto, such petition shall be deemed a petition for judicial review under this section, however such petition may be characterized on the face thereof.

History: L. 1984, ch. 338, § 10; L. 1986, ch. 318, § 5; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Plaintiff's claim for equitable relief governed exclusively by KJRA (K.S.A. 77-601 et seq.) statute of limitations. Douglass v. Kansas State University, 22 Kan. App. 2d 171, 174, 915 P.2d 782 (1996).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 106 P.3d 492 (Kan. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 106 P.3d 492 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 2× “8-259, K.S.A. 77-610, K.S.A. 77-613, K.S.A. 77-614, andK.”
Bruch v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 148 P.3d 538 (Kan. 2006). “) K.S.A. 77-610 of the KJRA provides: “Judicial review is initiated by filing a petition for judicial review in the appropriate court .”
Ryser v. State, 284 P.3d 337 (Kan. 2012). “, K.S.A. 77-610 (setting forth requirements for initiating a petition for judicial review, costs, and types of relief that may be sought); K.”
State v. Ernesti, 239 P.3d 40 (Kan. 2010). “77-607; K.S.A. 77-610. Although these initial steps on which the State’s argument is based are correct, those steps do not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the KJRA applies to this appeal.”
Douglass v. Kansas State Univ., 915 P.2d 782 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “Under K.S.A 77-610, Lindenman, and Fowles , the ruling of the district court is proper.”
Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 88 P.3d 1236 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “Referring to the KJRA, we note that K.S.A. 77-610 provides in pertinent part: “Judicial review is initiated by filing a petition for judicial review in the appropriate court and payment of the docket fee .”
Gilliam v. Kansas State Fair Bd. (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “K.S.A. 77-603; K.S.A. 77-606. As such, it governs our review here.”
E.F. v. Kansas Dept. for Child. & Families (Kan. Ct. App. 2025). “" K.S.A. 77-610. Basically, the district court concluded that the Grandparents could have mailed their petition and filing fee or filed in person during the court's normal business hours according to the Administrative Orders.”
State Ex Rel. Bremby v. Thorson, 210 P.3d 132 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “For example, K.S.A. 77-610 sets out the form of action for judicial review, while K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.