Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1968–2002 · leading case: Maine Farmers Exch., Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A., 2002 ME 18 (Me. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maine Farmers Exch., Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A., 2002 ME 18 (Me. 2002). · cites it 2× “will be to the former Article 9, 11 M.R.S.A. §§ 9-101 to 9-507 (1995 & Pamph.”
Quigley v. Caron, 247 A.2d 94 (Me. 1968). · cites it 2× “*95 The basic issue is whether under the Uniform Commercial Code-Secured Transactions (11 M.R.S.A. § 9-101 et seq.) the proceeds of the insurance are security for the potatoes destroyed by fire.”
United States v. H & S REALTY CO., 647 F. Supp. 1415 (D. Me. 1986). “The Court recognizes that H & S Realty’s Claim II against Key Bank appears to be governed by Maine law rather than federal common law, as 13 C.”
Hale v. Kontaratos (In Re Kontaratos), 10 B.R. 956 (Bankr. D. Me. 1981). “Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 9-101 [hereinafter cited: UCC §-].”
Wallingford's Inc. v. Waning (In Re Waning), 120 B.R. 607 (Bankr. D. Me. 1990). “Because this action relates only to the relation of the immediate parties (as opposed to a battle of priorities involving third parties) "perfection" issues are not present.”
In Re Kingsbury, 124 B.R. 146 (Bankr. D. Me. 1991). “Maine’s version of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, enacted at 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-101 et seq., provides guidance.”
In Re Dorsey, 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “Article 9 is found at 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-101, et seq. [33] FmHA does not agree that the body of principles controlling creation, perfection, priority and enforcement of such assignments provide the rules for decision here.”
Hannaford Bros. Co. v. State Tax Assessor, 487 A.2d 251 (Me. 1985). “” 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-101, Maine Code Comment. It is thus appropriate to rely on the same considerations to distinguish between a lease and a secured purchase under the use tax statute as under the Uniform Commercial Code.”
Bezanson v. Kennebunk Sav. Bank (In Re Ladd), 21 B.R. 579 (Bankr. D. Me. 1982). “3 Section 9-313(3) provides: “This Article [Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, §§ 9-101 et seq.”
First Nat'l Bank of Bar Harbor v. United States, Dep't of Agric., Farmers Home Admin. (In re Dorsey), 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “Article 9 is found at 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-101, et seq. . FmHA does not agree that the body of principles controlling creation, perfection, priority and enforcement of such assignments provide the rules for decision here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.