Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-104 (2026)

Transactions excluded from Article

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 526, §§9-12 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 696, §§121,122 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 604, §2 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 449, §1 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 625, §6 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 429, §§C9,10 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1980–2001 · leading case: Thico Plan, Inc. v. Maplewood Poultry Co. (In Re Maplewood Poultry Co.), 2 B.R. 550 (Bankr. D. Me. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thico Plan, Inc. v. Maplewood Poultry Co. (In Re Maplewood Poultry Co.), 2 B.R. 550 (Bankr. D. Me. 1980). · cites it 2× “Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11 § 9-104(7). The Maine Insurance Premium Finance Act, id.”
New England Mortg. Servs. Co. v. Petit, 590 A.2d 1054 (Me. 1991). · cites it 4× “at 1055) in a way that may give the impression that the subsection *1058 refers generally to all of the provisions of article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, including the provision that prevents the giving of a security interest in a tort suit, 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-104(11)…”
In Re Dorsey, 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). · cites it 2× “FmHA recognizes that its rights and priority under the assignment of rents, as such, are not determined by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
A-I Credit Corp. v. Big Squaw Mountain Corp. (In Re Big Squaw Mountain Corp.), 122 B.R. 831 (Bankr. D. Me. 1990). “§ 9-104 appears as 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-104. 15 . As enacted at 11 M.”
FDIC v. Caliendo, 802 F. Supp. 575 (D.N.H. 1992). “Me.Rev. Stat.Ann. tit. 11 § 9-104(7) (West 1964 & Supp.”
First Nat'l Bank of Bar Harbor v. United States, Dep't of Agric., Farmers Home Admin. (In re Dorsey), 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). · cites it 2× “31 A brief explanation follows. FmHA recognizes that its rights and priority under the assignment of rents, as such, are not determined by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
Poultry Processing, Inc. v. Mendelson, 584 A.2d 659 (Me. 1991). · cites it 2× “Defendants argue, however, that section 9-207 is incorporated by reference through the application of section 3-606.”
Maine Farmers Exch., Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A. (Me. Super. Ct 2001). “11 M.R.S.A. § 9-104 (1995). See In Re Apex Oil, Co.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-104(10) — 2 cases
In Re Dorsey, 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “FmHA recognizes that its rights and priority under the assignment of rents, as such, are not determined by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
First Nat'l Bank of Bar Harbor v. United States, Dep't of Agric., Farmers Home Admin. (In re Dorsey), 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “31 A brief explanation follows. FmHA recognizes that its rights and priority under the assignment of rents, as such, are not determined by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-104(11) — 1 case
New England Mortg. Servs. Co. v. Petit, 590 A.2d 1054 (Me. 1991). “at 1055) in a way that may give the impression that the subsection *1058 refers generally to all of the provisions of article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, including the provision that prevents the giving of a security interest in a tort suit, 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-104(11)…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-104(12) — 2 cases
In Re Dorsey, 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “FmHA recognizes that its rights and priority under the assignment of rents, as such, are not determined by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
First Nat'l Bank of Bar Harbor v. United States, Dep't of Agric., Farmers Home Admin. (In re Dorsey), 155 B.R. 263 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “31 A brief explanation follows. FmHA recognizes that its rights and priority under the assignment of rents, as such, are not determined by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-104(7) — 3 cases
Thico Plan, Inc. v. Maplewood Poultry Co. (In Re Maplewood Poultry Co.), 2 B.R. 550 (Bankr. D. Me. 1980). “Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11 § 9-104(7). The Maine Insurance Premium Finance Act, id.”
FDIC v. Caliendo, 802 F. Supp. 575 (D.N.H. 1992). “Me.Rev. Stat.Ann. tit. 11 § 9-104(7) (West 1964 & Supp.”
Poultry Processing, Inc. v. Mendelson, 584 A.2d 659 (Me. 1991). “Defendants argue, however, that section 9-207 is incorporated by reference through the application of section 3-606.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.