Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 103-D (2026)

Report to the Law Court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 514, §6 (NEW). PL 1981, c. 698, §197 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1995 · leading case: Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr. Corp., 612 A.2d 874 (Me. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr. Corp., 612 A.2d 874 (Me. 1992). “See 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-D (1989); M.R.Civ.P. 72(a).”
Mathieu v. Bath Iron Works, 667 A.2d 862 (Me. 1995). “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-D (1989). Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr.”
Wilner Wood Prods. Co. v. Moyse, 466 A.2d 1257 (Me. 1983). “See 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-D. 6 . Contrary to Wilner Wood’s contention, commission review of compensation agreements cannot be characterized as a “ministerial” function, even though the substantial number submitted for approval tends to make the process a routine one.”
Russell v. Duchess Footwear, 487 A.2d 256 (Me. 1985). “See 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-D. . 39 M.R.S.A. § 99 similarly mandates the commissioner to find the facts specially and state separately the Commission’s conclusions of law thereon in workers' compensation cases upon the request of a party made as a motion within 20 days after notice of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.