Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.59 (2026)

Review of order or decree.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION


Act 419 of 1919


460.59 Review of order or decree.

Sec. 9.

    Any order or decree shall be subject to review in the manner provided for in section 26 of Act No. 300 of the Public Acts of 1909, being section 462.26 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

History: 1919, Act 419, Imd. Eff. May 15, 1919 ;-- CL 1929, 11014 ;-- CL 1948, 460.59 ;-- Am. 1987, Act 7, Eff. Apr. 1, 1987

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1950–1997 · leading case: Rinaldo's Constr. Corp. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 559 N.W.2d 647 (Mich. 1997).
Rinaldo's Constr. Corp. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 559 N.W.2d 647 (Mich. 1997). “1469(203)(7), and MCL 460.59; MSA 22.9. 16 For example, if the customer was entitled to an allowance under the tariffs, and the telephone company arbitrarily refused the allowance, the customer could proceed in a court of general jurisdiction subject to the *78 jurisdictional…”
Ann Arbor R. v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 91 F. Supp. 668 (E.D. Mich. 1950). · cites it 4× “1948, § 460.59, Sec. 22.9, M.S.A., provides as follows: "Any order or decree shall be subject to review in the manner now provided by law for reviewing orders and decrees of the Michigan railroad commission.”
Attorney Gen. v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 221 N.W.2d 299 (Mich. 1974). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] Section 26 was retained when the Public Utilities Commission succeeded the Railroad Commission, MCLA 460.59; MSA 22.9, and when the MPSC in turn succeeded the Public Utilities Commission.”
In re Fed. Preemption of Provisions of the Motor Carrier Act, 566 N.W.2d 299 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “1320, MCL 460.59; MSA 22.9, MCL 460.557(6); MSA 22.”
J. E. Bejin Cartage Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 89 N.W.2d 607 (Mich. 1958). “† See, specifically, section 9 (CL' 1948, § 460.59 [Stat Ann § 22.9]).—Reporter. ‡ CL 1948, §460.”
Union Carbide Corp. v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 395 N.W.2d 292 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “45 and MCL 460.59; MSA 22.9. Consumers promptly moved to intervene as party plaintiff in that suit, and filed a separate complaint on its own behalf for review of the same commission order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.