Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 479.20 (2026)

Review of order or decree.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Aug. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE MOTOR CARRIER ACT


Act 254 of 1933


479.20 Review of order or decree.

Sec. 20.

    Any order or decree of the commission shall be subject to review in the manner provided for in section 26 of Act No. 300 of the Public Acts of 1909, being section 462.26 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

History: 1933, Act 254, Eff. Oct. 17, 1933 ;-- Am. 1939, Act 261, Eff. Jan. 10, 1942 ;-- Am. 1943, Act 244, Imd. Eff. Apr. 22, 1943 ;-- CL 1948, 479.20 ;-- Am. 1951, Act 150, Eff. Sept. 28, 1951 ;-- Am. 1982, Act 399, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 1982 ;-- Am. 1987, Act 9, Eff. Apr. 1, 1987

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1952–1997 · leading case: Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 140 N.W.2d 515 (Mich. 1966).
Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 140 N.W.2d 515 (Mich. 1966). · cites it 5× “[4] CLS 1961, § 479.20 (Stat Ann 1963 Cum Supp § 22.585).”
Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 252 N.W.2d 495 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 4× “An appeal from a PSC determination to the Ingham County Circuit Court is provided by *481 MCLA 479.20; MSA 22.585. In material part that statute provides: "Any party to such suit may introduce original evidence in addition to the transcript of evidence offered to said commission.”
Vets. Airport Serv., Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 147 N.W.2d 455 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 5× “Decision requires a determination of the effect a petition for rehearing before the commission has on the 80-day appeal period provided in CLS 1961, §479.20 (Stat Ann 1965 Cum Supp §22.585), and whether plaintiff’s appeal to Ingham circuit court included an appeal from the…”
J. E. Bejin Cartage Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 89 N.W.2d 607 (Mich. 1958). · cites it 3× “Section 20 of article 5 of the act (CLS 1956, § 479.20 [Stat Ann 1955 Cum Supp § 22.585]) provides that aggrieved parties may within 30 days from the date of the order complained of file a chancery suit in the circuit court for Ingham county.”
Greyhound Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 104 N.W.2d 395 (Mich. 1960). · cites it 2× “Provisions pertaining to the review of an order of the public service commission by the circuit court of Ingham county under the motor carrier act [**] are found in CLS 1956, § 479.20 (Stat Ann 1959 Cum Supp § 22.585).”
Michigan Intra-State Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 504 N.W.2d 677 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “See MCL 479.20; MSA 22.585 and MCL 462.26; MSA 22.”
In re Fed. Preemption of Provisions of the Motor Carrier Act, 566 N.W.2d 299 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “MCL 479.20; MSA 22.585 provides that “[a]ny order or decree of the commission shall be subject to review in the manner provided for in [MCL 462.”
Telischak Trucking, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 160 N.W.2d 592 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 6× “585), plaintiff filed complaint in Ingham county circuit court to appeal an order of Michigan public service commission requiring plaintiff to cease and desist from transporting cement, except as specifically authorized in plaintiff's authority.”
Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 414 N.W.2d 687 (Mich. 1987). · cites it 2× “] 15 MCL 479.20; MSA 22.585. 16 MCL 486.551 et seq.”
Short Freight Lines, Inc. v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n & Cent. Transp., Inc., 181 N.W.2d 560 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 4× “Plaintiff had brought the action to the Ingham County Circuit Court pursuant to MCLA § 479.20 (Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 22.”
Furniture Capital Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 65 N.W.2d 303 (Mich. 1954). “” CL 1948, § 479.20 (Stat Ann 1953 Cum Supp § 22.585).”
Michigan Towing Ass'n v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 166 N.W.2d 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “Plaintiff brought an appeal in the circuit court from an order of defendant denying *526 a motion for rehearing pursuant to § 20, art V of the Motor Carriers Act, as amended, CLS 1961, §479.20 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 22.585).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.