Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1702 (2026)
Confirmation of award.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT
Act 371 of 2012
691.1702 Confirmation of award.
Sec. 22.
After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a confirming order unless the award is modified or corrected under section 20 or 24 or is vacated under section 23.
History: 2012, Act 371, Eff. July 1, 2013
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Simcor Constr. Inc v. Carl J Trupp III, 912 N.W.2d 216 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
Simcor Constr. Inc v. Carl J Trupp III, 912 N.W.2d 216 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 691.1702 of the Uniform Arbitration Act, MCL 691.”
W.J. O'Neil Co. v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., 765 F.3d 625 (6th Cir. 2014). “See Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 691.1702 , .1703 (providing that a court may confirm, modify or correct, or vacate an arbitration award).”
Alpert v. City of Ann Arbor, 431 N.W.2d 467 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “” MCL 691.1702; MSA 3.996(102). This limitation of the exception to immunity for the state and counties is in contrast to the liability imposed on *230 municipalities and other units of government by § 2 of the act.”
Simcor Constr. Inc v. Carl J Trupp III (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “MCL 691.1702 of the Uniform Arbitration Act states: Sec.”
Charlie Davis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “1705(1) provides: “On granting an order confirming .”
Kyle Morski v. Grandville Constr. & Dev. Co. Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “MCL 691.1702 addresses court confirmation of an award, and provides that “[a]fter a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a confirming order unless the…”
John Henry Rozanski v. Fred S Findling (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “] Likewise, MCL 691.1702 governs the confirmation of arbitration awards and provides, in pertinent part, as follows: After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court…”
John Henry Rozanski v. Fred S Findling (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “] Likewise, MCL 691.1702 governs the confirmation of arbitration awards and provides, in pertinent part, as follows: After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court…”
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “MCL 691.1702 does not specify a time in which a motion to confirm an award must be brought, and the corresponding court rule provides a one-year time limit.”
Benjamin Ciotti v. Andre Harris (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “MCL 691.1702 does not specify a time in which a motion to confirm an award must be brought, and the corresponding court rule provides a one-year time limit.”
2727 Russell Street LLC v. Bert W Dearing Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “MCL 691.1702 provides the standard for a circuit court’s confirmation of arbitration awards and states that, “[a]fter a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may move the -7- court for an order confirming the award at which time the court…”
Dom. Unif. Rental v. Riversbend Rehab. (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “602 and MCL 691.1702. In that motion, plaintiff represented that the arbitrator entered an award of $39,075.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.