Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 2. TERRITORIAL DIVISIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 2.01 (2026)

Names And Boundaries

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state is divided into the several counties named in the following schedule, the boundaries whereof, except as changed or established by vote of the people since the year 1892, are as fixed by the several laws referred to in the schedule after their respective names. The laws so referred to are hereby continued in force so far as they relate to the fixing of county lines at the respective dates of their passage.

SCHEDULE

Aitkin (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 2; 1871 c. 96; Sp. L. 1872 c. 145; 1887 c. 117); Anoka (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 4; Id. s. 36; Const. art. 11, s. 7); Becker (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 5); Beltrami (1866 c. 46; 1879 c. 10 s. 1; 1889 c. 75 s. 1); (Lake of the Woods County formed therefrom 1922); Benton (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 6); Big Stone (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 7; Sp. L. 1876 c. 159); Blue Earth (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 8); Brown (1865 c. 71 s. 3; G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 9); Carlton (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 10); Carver (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 11); Cass (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 12; 1883 c. 78 s. 1, 1887 c. 116 s. 1, c. 117 s. 1, c. 118 s. 1; 1889 c. 75 s. 2); Chippewa (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 13; 1868 c. 113 s. 1); Chisago (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 14); Clay (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 15); Clearwater (formed by popular vote); Cook (1874 c. 100 s. 1); Cottonwood (1865 c. 71 s. 2; G.S. 1866 c. 16); Crow Wing (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 17; 1887 c. 118 s. 2); Dakota (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 18; 1871 c. 97 s. 1; 1874 c. 101 s. 1); Dodge (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 19); Douglas (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 20); Faribault (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 21); Fillmore (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 22); Freeborn (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 23); Goodhue (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 24); Grant (1868 c. 109 s. 5); Hennepin (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 25); Houston (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 26); Hubbard (1883 c. 78 s. 1); Isanti (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 27); Itasca (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 28; 1871 c. 96; 1887 c. 116 s. 1); (Koochiching County formed therefrom 1906); Jackson (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 29); Kanabec (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 30); Kandiyohi (G.S. 1866 c. 8 ss. 31, 41; 1870 c. 92 s. 1); Kittson (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 49; 1878 c. 59 s. 1; 1879 c. 10 s. 2); Koochiching (formed by popular vote 1906); Lac qui Parle (1871 c. 100 s. 1); Lake (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 33; 1874 c. 100 s. 1; 1895 c. 248); Lake of the Woods (formed by popular vote 1922); Le Sueur (Sts. 1849-58 c. 1 s. 71; G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 34); Lincoln (1873 c. 92 s. 1); Lyon (1868 c. 112 s. 1; 1869 c. 94 s. 1; 1873 c. 92 s. 1); McLeod (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 38); Mahnomen (formed by popular vote 1906); Marshall (1879 c. 10 s. 3; 1883 c. 81 s. 1); Martin (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 37); Meeker (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 39; 1870 c. 97 s. 1); Mille Lacs (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 40); Morrison (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 42; 1867 c. 116 s. 1; 1870 c. 98 s. 1); Mower (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 43); Murray (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 44); Nicollet (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 45); Nobles (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 46); Norman (1881 c. 92 s. 1); (Mahnomen County formed therefrom 1906); Olmsted (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 47); Otter Tail (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 48; 1872 c. 87 s. 1); Pennington (formed by popular vote 1910); Pine (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 50); Pipestone (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 51); Polk (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 52; 1866 c. 46 s. 1; 1881 c. 92 s. 1); Pope (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 53; 1866 c. 44 s. 1); Ramsey (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 54; 1874 c. 101 s. 1); Red Lake (formed by popular vote); (Pennington County formed therefrom 1910); Redwood (1865 c. 71 s. 1; G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 55; 1869 c. 94 s. 1; 1871 c. 98 s. 1; 1871 c. 100 s. 1; 1873 c. 92 s. 1); Renville (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 56; 1866 c. 43 s. 1; 1868 c. 10 s. 1; 1870 c. 97 s. 1); Rice (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 57); Rock (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 58); Roseau (formed by popular vote); St. Louis (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 59; 1895 c. 248); Scott (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 60; 1871 c. 97 s. 1; Sp. L. 1870 c. 2 subd. 1; Sp. L. 1875 c. 6 subd. 1 s. 2); Sherburne (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 61); Sibley (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 62); Stearns (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 63; 1870 c. 98 s. 1; 1874 c. 102 s. 1); Steele (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 64); Stevens (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 55; 1868 c. 109 s. 1); Swift (1870 c. 90 s. 1); Todd (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 66; 1867 c. 116 s. 2; 1868 c. 114 s. 1; 1874 c. 102 s. 1); Traverse (1881 c. 130 s. 1); Wabasha (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 68); Wadena (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 69); Waseca (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 70); Washington (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 71); Watonwan (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 72); Wilkin (1872 c. 83 s. 1); Winona (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 73); Wright (G.S. 1866 c. 8 s. 74); Yellow Medicine (1871 c. 98 s. 1).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1984–2020 · leading case: City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 12× “21(c) (Section 2.01). [6] The State Building Code also requires the installation of smoke detectors "[i]n each sleeping room" and in other locations throughout the structure.”
Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 2014). · cites it 22× “Pursuant to Section 2.01 of PSA, within 30 days following the closing date of the trust, the depositor was required to deliver to the trustee, for the benefit of the eertificateholders, the original mortgage note along with “intervening endorsements showing a complete chain of…”
In Re Hennepin Cnty. 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 540 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 4× “The Loan Agreement provides at Sections 2.01 and 2.02 for issuance of the Series 1986A Bonds, the disposition of the bond proceeds, the title to the Project building and equipment (see also Section 3.”
State v. Lemmer, 736 N.W.2d 650 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 2.01 (2006); County of Freeborn v.”
Jackson v. Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc., 770 N.W.2d 487 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 2× “II, § 2.01 (March 1, 2004), available at http://www.”
Kahn v. Griffin, 701 N.W.2d 815 (Minn. 2005). “See Saint Paul, Minnesota City Charter, §§ 2.01, 2.02, 4.01.2, 4.01.3 (2004). All seven council members run for election at the same time for four-year terms, and the City of Saint Paul redistricts after every federal decennial census.”
Regents of the Univ. v. Applied Innovations, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 698 (D. Minnesota 1987). · cites it 2× “18, § 2.01. The originality requirement as provided in the 1976 Act was intended to codify without change the concept of “originality” applied by the courts under the 1909 Act.”
OmegaGenesis Corp. v. Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Rsch., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (D. Minnesota 2015). “§ 2.01. Under the License Agreement, Mayo gave OmegaGenesis the right to prosecute the still-pending patent application, develop the product, and bring the product to market.”
Winkel v. Eden Rehab. Treatment Facility, Inc., 433 N.W.2d 135 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “An actual agency relationship results from the manifestation of consent by the principal to the agent that the agent shall act on the principal’s behalf.”
Nat'l Hockey League v. Nat'l Hockey League Players Ass'n, 789 F. Supp. 288 (D. Minnesota 1992). · cites it 2× “II § 2.01. 4 Consequently, the NHL contends that a full-text “proposed revision” should have accompanied the notice.”
Hutchinson Tel. Co. v. Fronteer Directory Co. of Minnesota, Inc., 586 F. Supp. 911 (D. Minnesota 1984). “Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[A], at 2-8 (1980). The term “works of authorship,” on the other hand, is defined in the Act and includes compilations.”
UMB Bank, N.A. v. Ad Lucem Inc. (D. Minnesota 2020). “¶¶ 9–10; Agreement § 2.01. Marquette would attempt to collect assigned accounts directly 1 The Clerk properly entered default.”
— Minn. Stat. § 2.01(a) — 1 case
Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 2014). “Pursuant to Section 2.01 of PSA, within 30 days following the closing date of the trust, the depositor was required to deliver to the trustee, for the benefit of the eertificateholders, the original mortgage note along with “intervening endorsements showing a complete chain of…”
— Minn. Stat. § 2.01(b) — 1 case
Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 2014). “Pursuant to Section 2.01 of PSA, within 30 days following the closing date of the trust, the depositor was required to deliver to the trustee, for the benefit of the eertificateholders, the original mortgage note along with “intervening endorsements showing a complete chain of…”
— Minn. Stat. § 2.01(c)(ii) — 1 case
Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 2014). “Pursuant to Section 2.01 of PSA, within 30 days following the closing date of the trust, the depositor was required to deliver to the trustee, for the benefit of the eertificateholders, the original mortgage note along with “intervening endorsements showing a complete chain of…”
— Minn. Stat. § 2.01(c)(iii) — 1 case
Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 2014). “Pursuant to Section 2.01 of PSA, within 30 days following the closing date of the trust, the depositor was required to deliver to the trustee, for the benefit of the eertificateholders, the original mortgage note along with “intervening endorsements showing a complete chain of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.