Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 487. COUNTY COURTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 487.39 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1987 c 346 s 18]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1973–1987 · leading case: Marriage of Gordon v. Gordon, 339 N.W.2d 269 (Minn. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marriage of Gordon v. Gordon, 339 N.W.2d 269 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 4× “2 (1982), from a decision of a three-judge panel of the Dakota County District Court reversing the decision of the county court which authorized her to remove the parties' three minor children from this jurisdiction.”
State v. Beckman, 209 N.W.2d 402 (Minn. 1973). · cites it 9× “1971, § 487.39, subd. 1, of the County Court Act, without distinguishing between civil and criminal cases, simply provides in part: “An aggrieved party may appeal to a district court judge from a determination of a county court.”
Knutson v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 406 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal as provided in Minn.Stat. § 487.39. Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd.”
State v. Wingo, 266 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 2× “432, § 28, the legislature amended § 487.39 to specifically bring appeals from county municipal courts within the purview of the County Court Act.”
In re Est. of Janda, 353 N.W.2d 211 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “Appellant claims this appeal is governed by Minn.Stat. § 487.39 (Supp.1983), which provides in part: Subdivision 1.”
Stolp v. Scrimshaw, 220 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1974). “*160 The propriety of this court’s discretionary act in granting or denying these applications for leave to appeal, as provided in § 487.39, 1 poses important constitutional issues concerning this court’s appellate powers and the legislature’s power to authorize judicial…”
Appeal of O'Rourke, 220 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1974). “The propriety of this court's discretionary act in granting or denying these applications for leave to appeal, as provided in § 487.39, [1] poses important constitutional issues concerning this court's appellate powers and the legislature's power to authorize judicial discretion…”
State v. Pilla, 380 N.W.2d 207 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 487.39 (1984), while technically inapplicable since the appeal was from a district court judgment (the county court and district court have merged in the Tenth Judicial District), is of some relevance.”
Ebert v. State, 284 N.W.2d 548 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 487.39, subd. 2 (1978); Rule 29.”
State Dept. of Pub. Saf. v. Ogg, 246 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1976). “Following this court’s decision in Kaasa, the legislature amended § 487.39, subd. 1, of the County Court Act to read (L.”
Pan v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 347 N.W.2d 545 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Pan appeals pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 487.39 (1982), asserting he was not the driver and the court erred in failing to admit two officers’ reports as evidence.”
City of Rochester v. Stevens, 220 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1974). “Since § 487.39 says nothing about the time within which appeals must be taken to the supreme court, the times are the same as in other cases which means that appeals by the state in criminal cases must comply with § 632.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.