Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 501B.16 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2014 [Repealed, 2015 c 5 art 16 s 2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases, 1991–2017 · leading case: In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Auth. of St. Paul, 772 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 2009).
In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Auth. of St. Paul, 772 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 38× “In 2002 and 2004 the Port Authority filed petitions for instructions regarding Basic Resolution 876 pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (2008). The Ramsey County District Court granted the petitions, which allowed the Port Authority to, among other things, conduct Dutch auctions…”
In Re Horton, 668 N.W.2d 208 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 10× “On July 11, 2002, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (2002), CWCSS petitioned the district court for an order directing respondent to make trust assets available for any placement it deemed medically necessary for Horton.”
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust, 818 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 4× “The Trustee filed the petition because the Trust, not Pamela’s probate estate, paid Pamela’s estate taxes.”
Bolander v. Bolander, 703 N.W.2d 529 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “361 (Count I); alleging breach of fiduciary duty (Count II); seeking relief under Minn.Stat. §§ 501B.16 and *535 .21 (Count III); and reformation or modification of the irrevocable trust with a declaration of the parties' rights under the shareholder agreement and the…”
In Re the Trusteeship Created by the Sheridan, 593 N.W.2d 702 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 12× “Under Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (1998), district courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over issues involving trusts.”
In Re Est. & Trust of Anderson, 654 N.W.2d 682 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “Preclusive Effect of Earlier Ruling In June 1999, Powell petitioned the district court to remove Anderson as trustee pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (2002). The district court ruled on the petition in an order filed March 13, 2000.”
Matter of Trusts Created by Hormel, 504 N.W.2d 505 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “The beneficiaries cross-petitioned under Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (1992) for an order instructing the Foundation to diversify the trusts, alleging that the Foundation had breached its fiduciary duty by failing to diversify.”
First Trust Co. v. Union Depot Place Ltd. P'ship, 476 N.W.2d 178 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “Reasoning that the fund was the one source from which the bondholders could recover their losses, First Trust petitioned under Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (1990) for instructions regarding administration of the trust.”
In re the Trusteeships Created by Tropic CDO I Ltd., 92 F. Supp. 3d 163 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 501B.16. In these petitions, the Trustee seeks “entry of an order confirming that (a) it has correctly interpreted the relevant terms in each indenture pertaining to distribution of principal and interest proceeds following the failure of an overcollateralization…”
Matter of Trust Created by Hill, 499 N.W.2d 475 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 501B.16(19) (1990) (person interested in trust may petition to redress breach of trust).”
Premier Ent. Biloxi LLC v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (In Re Premier Ent. Biloxi LLC), 445 B.R. 582 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2010). · cites it 2× “Paul, Minnesota, the principal place of its corporate trust business, to obtain approval from the State of Minnesota District Court, Second Judicial District, Ramsey County, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501B.16, 89 to take all actions reasonable or necessary to consummate the…”
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust Created Under Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1974, 674 N.W.2d 222 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 28× “Respondent trustees brought a petition pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (2002), requesting the district court to determine beneficiaries and interpret terms of three trusts created by settlor JHM.”
— Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(17) — 1 case
In re the S.H. Bowman Trust ex rel. McCourt, 804 N.W.2d 361 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(19) — 6 cases
Matter of Trust Created by Hill, 499 N.W.2d 475 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See Minn.Stat. § 501B.16(19) (1990) (person interested in trust may petition to redress breach of trust).”
In Re Margolis Revocable Trust, 765 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009).
In re the Trust Created by Boss, 487 N.W.2d 256 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992).
Lorberbaum v. Huff, 765 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009).
Matter of Boss, 487 N.W.2d 256 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992).
— Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(23) — 2 cases
In Re Margolis Revocable Trust, 765 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009).
Lorberbaum v. Huff, 765 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009).
— Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(3) — 1 case
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust Created Under Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1974, 674 N.W.2d 222 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “Respondent trustees brought a petition pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501B.16 (2002), requesting the district court to determine beneficiaries and interpret terms of three trusts created by settlor JHM.”
— Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(4) — 1 case
In Re Foley Trust, 671 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(9) — 3 cases
In re the Est. of: Mary Ann Nething (Minn. Ct. App. 2015).
— Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(9)(i) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.