Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2612 (2026)

Confirmation of award

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Within sixty days of the application of a party, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as provided in sections 25-2613 and 25-2614.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2003–2022 · leading case: Garlock v. 3DS Props., L. L.C., 303 Neb. 521 (Neb. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Garlock v. 3DS Props., L. L.C., 303 Neb. 521 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 5× “*515 ERROR NOT TO CONFIRM AWARD UNDER § 25-2612 Section 25-2612 provides: Within sixty days of the application of a party, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in…”
Hartman v. City of Grand Island, 657 N.W.2d 641 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “” Section 25-2612 provides: “Within sixty days of the application of a party, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as…”
Signal 88 v. Lyconic, 29 Neb. Ct. App. 533 (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 9× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2612 (Reissue 2016); Drummond v.”
Cinatl v. Prososki, 307 Neb. 477 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “31 See § 25-2612. - 490 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 307 Nebraska Reports CINATL v.”
Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding Holdings (Ny), LLC, 302 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “2d at 645 (" '[w]ithin sixty days of the application of a party, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as provided in sections…”
Signal 88 v. Lyconic, 310 Neb. 824 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 9× “After the arbitrator rendered a decision, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2612 (Reissue 2016), Lyconic moved the district court to confirm the arbitrator’s award.”
Garlock v. 3DS Props., 303 Neb. 521 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 7× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2612 (Reissue 2016) of the Uniform Arbitration Act does not allow for the exercise of discretion by the court when a request of confirmation is made where there has been no appli- cation for vacation or modification.”
Signal 88 v. Lyconic, 310 Neb. 824 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 9× “After the arbitrator rendered a decision, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2612 (Reissue 2016), Lyconic moved the district court to confirm the arbitrator’s award.”
Est. of Guido v. Exempla, Inc., 292 P.3d 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). “§§ 27-5-311 to -313 (2011); Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 25-2612 to - 2614 (2011); Nev.”
Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding Holdings, 302 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “2d at 645 (“‘[w]ithin sixty days of the application of a party, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as provided in sections…”
Damrow v. Murdoch, 739 N.W.2d 229 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “On May 28, 2002, the Appellees filed a motion in the district court under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2612 (Reissue 1995), seeking to confirm the arbitration award.”
Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding Holdings, 302 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “2d at 645 (“‘[w]ithin sixty days of the application of a party, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as provided in sections…”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.