The Legislature finds that sex offenders present a high risk to commit repeat offenses. The Legislature further finds that efforts of law enforcement agencies to protect their communities, conduct investigations, and quickly apprehend sex offenders are impaired by the lack of available information about individuals who have pleaded guilty to or have been found guilty of sex offenses and who live, work, or attend school in their jurisdiction. The Legislature further finds that state policy should assist efforts of local law enforcement agencies to protect their communities by requiring sex offenders to register with local law enforcement agencies as provided by the Sex Offender Registration Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases, 2004–2017 · leading case:
State v. Boche, 885 N.W.2d 523 (Neb. 2016).
State v. Boche, 885 N.W.2d 523 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 2× “23 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4002 (Reissue 2008).”
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 883 N.W.2d 363 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 2× “23 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4002 (Reissue 2008).”
Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol, 685 N.W.2d 335 (Neb. 2004).
· cites it 3× “See § 29-4002. In this regard, SORA applies to any person who on or after January 1, 1997, (1) pleads guilty to or is found guilty of one of a number of enumerated offenses, most of which are sexual in nature; (2) enters the State of Nebraska after having pled guilty to or been…”
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010).
· cites it 2× “” Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-4002 (West, Operative Jan.”
State v. Hamilton, 763 N.W.2d 731 (Neb. 2009).
“[24] § 29-4002. [25] Id. [26] See § 29-4005(1) and (2).”
Doe v. Nebraska, 898 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (D. Neb. 2012).
· cites it 2× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-4002 ("The Legislature finds that sex offenders present a high risk to commit repeat offenses.”
State v. Worm, 680 N.W.2d 151 (Neb. 2004).
“§ 29-4002 (Cum. Supp. 2000). These findings show that the Act has a dual purpose: protecting the public and assisting law enforcement in future efforts to investigate and resolve sex offenses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.