Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 42
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

42-925.

Transferred to section 26-109.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Maria A. on behalf of Leslie G. v. Oscar G., 301 Neb. 673 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maria A. on behalf of Leslie G. v. Oscar G., 301 Neb. 673 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 24× “Oscar requested a hearing on the matter pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Reissue 2016) to show cause why the protection order should not remain in effect.”
Robert M. on behalf of Bella O. v. Danielle O., 303 Neb. 268 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Cum. Supp. 2018).”
Rosberg v. Rosberg, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 856 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Specifically, when a party seeks a protection order under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, if the trial court reviewing a petition determines a domestic abuse ex parte temporary protection order need not be issued, the court "shall immediately schedule an evidentiary…”
Courtney v. Jimenez, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 75 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 19× “The 5-day period to file a show cause hearing request as set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (1) (Reissue 2016) is directory and not mandatory.”
William P. v. Jamie P., 313 Neb. 378 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “The district court entered a domestic abuse protection order against her on February 24, 2022, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Cum. Supp. 2022).”
Hron v. Donlan, 609 N.W.2d 379 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 3× “The Douglas County District Court granted an ex parte protection order, as provided in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Réissue 1993), on July 14,1998.”
Paw K. v. Christian G., 315 Neb. 781 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 2× “Through this filing, Christian made a general appearance that conferred jurisdiction over him.”
In Re Est. of Wilson, 594 N.W.2d 695 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Reissue 1993), which provides for emergency issuance of protection orders: Any order .”
Zuco v. Tucker, 609 N.W.2d 59 (Neb. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “Further, we note that protection orders, as applied in this case, are governed by § 42-924 and Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-925 and 42-926 (Reissue 1998).”
Elstun v. Elstun, 589 N.W.2d 334 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Reissue 1993) provides that *106 such orders may be issued ex parte but that a hearing must be held to provide the adverse party an opportunity to show why the order should not remain in effect.”
Garrison v. Otto, 311 Neb. 94 (Neb. 2022). “Principles of law of the case generally bar reconsideration of the same or similar issues at successive 21 § 42-925(5). 22 § 42-924(3)(iii). 23 § 42-924(1)(b).”
Hoblyn v. Johnson, 2002 WY 152 (Wyo. 2002). “These orders stated, as provided in Neb.Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (1998), 4 that a respondent has the right to file a request for a show cause hearing to demonstrate why the order should not remain in effect.”
Show all 40 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925(1) — 12 cases
Maria A. on behalf of Leslie G. v. Oscar G., 301 Neb. 673 (Neb. 2018). “Oscar requested a hearing on the matter pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Reissue 2016) to show cause why the protection order should not remain in effect.”
Courtney v. Jimenez, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 75 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). “The 5-day period to file a show cause hearing request as set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (1) (Reissue 2016) is directory and not mandatory.”
Rachel C. on behalf of Clayton R. v. Amos R., 32 Neb. Ct. App. 473 (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
Darcy v. v. DeWolf (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
Krystal C. v. John B. (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925(2) — 3 cases
Maria A. on behalf of Leslie G. v. Oscar G., 301 Neb. 673 (Neb. 2018). “Oscar requested a hearing on the matter pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Reissue 2016) to show cause why the protection order should not remain in effect.”
Vanderburg v. Vanderburg (Neb. Ct. App. 2013).
Koch v. Koch (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925(2)(a) — 1 case
Koch v. Koch (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925(3) — 2 cases
Jacobo v. Zoltenko, 30 Neb. Ct. App. 44 (Neb. Ct. App. 2021).
Welch v. Welch (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925(4) — 2 cases
Maria A. on behalf of Leslie G. v. Oscar G., 301 Neb. 673 (Neb. 2018). “Oscar requested a hearing on the matter pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925 (Reissue 2016) to show cause why the protection order should not remain in effect.”
Sarah K. v. Jonathan K. (Neb. Ct. App. 2015).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-925(5) — 1 case
Garrison v. Otto, 311 Neb. 94 (Neb. 2022). “Principles of law of the case generally bar reconsideration of the same or similar issues at successive 21 § 42-925(5). 22 § 42-924(3)(iii). 23 § 42-924(1)(b).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.