Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-829 (2026)

Antitrust action; construction; federal law

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When any provision of sections 59-801 to 59-831 and sections 84-211 to 84-214 or any provision of Chapter 59 is the same as or similar to the language of a federal antitrust law, the courts of this state in construing such sections or chapter shall follow the construction given to the federal law by the federal courts.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1995–2019 · leading case: Arthur v. Microsoft Corp., 676 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Arthur v. Microsoft Corp., 676 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 34× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-829 (Reissue 1998) provides: "When .”

Kanne v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., 723 N.W.2d 293 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 3× “” § 59-829. Because the remedial provisions of the Junkin Act and Clayton Act are so similar, § 59-829 requires that we follow the federal courts’ construction of the Clayton Act.”

Heath Consultants, Inc. v. Precision Instruments, Inc., 527 N.W.2d 596 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 4× “THE TYING ARRANGEMENT Section 59-829 declares: "When any provision of .”

Salem Grain Co. v. Consol. Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “Before examining these statutes, however, we note Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-829 (Reissue 2010) provides that when “any provision of Chapter 59 is the same as or similar to the language of a federal antitrust law, the courts of this state in construing such sections or chapter shall…”

In Re New Motor Vehs. Canadian Exp. Antitrust Litig., 350 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D. Me. 2004). “In Nebraska, for example, the antitrust statute requires that when any language in the state statute is “the same as or similar to the language of a federal antitrust law,” Nebraska courts “shall follow the construction given to the federal law by the federal courts.”

In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litig., 516 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “§ 44-1412 (“in construing this article, the courts may use as a guide interpretations given by the federal courts to comparable federal antitrust statutes”); Neb.Rev. Stat. § 59-829 (“the courts of this state in construing [Nebraska’s antitrust statute] shall follow the…”

In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig., 362 F. Supp. 3d 510 (E.D. Ill. 2019). “" Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 59-829 . Illinois Brick Repealer Statute : "Any person who is injured in his or her business or property by any other person or persons by a violation of sections 59-801 to 59-831, whether such injured person dealt directly or indirectly with the…”

In Re Flash Memory Antitrust Litig., 643 F. Supp. 2d 1133 (N.D. Cal. 2009). “§ 44-1412 (“in construing this article, the courts may use as a guide interpretations given by the federal courts to comparable federal antitrust statutes”); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-829 (“the courts of this state in construing [Nebraska’s antitrust statute] shall follow the…”

Time Ins. v. Astrazeneca AB, 52 F. Supp. 3d 705 (E.D. Pa. 2014). “784(2); Neb.Rev. Stat. § 59-829 (same); Nev.Rev.Stat.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.