Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 71
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-159 (2026)

Transferred to section 38-1,102

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

71-159.

Transferred to section 38-1,102.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1973–2016 · leading case: Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mahnke v. State, Dept. of Health, 751 N.W.2d 635 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “STANDARD OF REVIEW [1, 2] The State appealed the district court's order under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-159 (Reissue 2003). That statute provides that "[b]oth parties [to a disciplinary proceeding under the Uniform Licensing Law] shall have the right of appeal, and the appeal shall be…”
Langvardt v. Horton, 581 N.W.2d 60 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-159 (Reissue 1996) provides that disciplinary measures taken against a professional licensee may be *889 appealed, and such appeal “shall be in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act.”
Purdie v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 292 Neb. 524 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “2d 60, 67 (1998) (noting that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-159 (Reissue 1996) provided that disciplinary measures taken against a profes- sional licensee could be appealed “‘in accordance with the [APA]’” and that therefore disciplinary proceeding was con- tested case); Richardson v.”
Kerrey Buser, M.D. v. Richard Raymond etc., 476 F.3d 565 (8th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-159 . Dr. Buser is subject to the Nebraska Licensing Law, as he operates a surgical medical practice in Lexington, Nebraska, and is licensed in Nebraska.”
Coil v. Nebraska State Dep't of Health, 204 N.W. 167 (Neb. 1973). · cites it 2× “Coil, in his petition for review, complains that the action of the board of examiners making a negative recommendation is beyond its powers under the statutes and claims that this was the basis of the .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.