Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 71
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-155 (2026)

Transferred to section 38-196

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

71-155.

Transferred to section 38-196.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–2008 · leading case: State v. Wolf, 549 N.W.2d 183 (Neb. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Wolf, 549 N.W.2d 183 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 30× “1994), and prayed for relief under any or all of the provisions of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-155 (Cum.Supp.1994). The record does not indicate the date of filing of the Attorney General's petition against Wolf, nor does the record indicate what, if anything, transpired between the…”
Davis v. Wright, 503 N.W.2d 814 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 4× “The hearing was held in conformity with § 71-155, which provided in part that “[t]he proceeding [for the revocation or suspension of a license or certificate] shall be summary in its nature and triable as an equity action.”
Langvardt v. Horton, 581 N.W.2d 60 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 3× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-155 (Supp. 1997) states that “[t]he proceeding under section 71-150 shall be summary in its nature and triable as an equity action and shall be heard by the Director of Regulation and Licensure or by a hearing officer designated by the director under rules…”
Kloch v. Kohl, 545 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. 2008). “See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 71-155, 71-171. If the Attorney General decided to prosecute a case, a formal hearing was required, and a neutral official would adjudicate the dispute.”
Coil v. Nebraska State Dep't of Health, 204 N.W. 167 (Neb. 1973). · cites it 6× “Coil under the provisions of section 71-155, R. R. S. 1943, for reinstatement of a license to practice pharmacy in the State of Nebraska.”
Gregory Kloch v. Jon C. Bruning, etc. (8th Cir. 2008). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-155 , 71-171. If the Attorney General decided to prosecute a case, a formal hearing was required, and a neutral official would adjudicate the dispute.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-155(5) — 1 case
State v. Wolf, 549 N.W.2d 183 (Neb. 1996). “1994), and prayed for relief under any or all of the provisions of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 71-155 (Cum.Supp.1994). The record does not indicate the date of filing of the Attorney General's petition against Wolf, nor does the record indicate what, if anything, transpired between the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.