Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4511
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.0911 (2026)

Traffic law photo-monitoring device maintenance records; accuracy; issuance of certain tickets prohibited

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
March 23, 2015
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 342 - 130th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) Upon request, each manufacturer of a traffic law photo-monitoring device shall provide to a local authority utilizing its devices the maintenance record of any such device used in that local authority.

(B)(1) Commencing January 2015, not later than the last day of January of each year, the manufacturer of a traffic law photo-monitoring device shall provide to the applicable local authority a certificate of proper operation that attests to the accuracy of the device in recording a traffic law violation.

(2) In addition to the requirement prescribed in division (B)(1) of this section, for every such device that is considered mobile, meaning it is attached to a trailer, vehicle, or other wheeled apparatus so that it is easily moved to different system locations, both of the following apply:

(a) Each local authority shall test the accuracy of each such device with an independent, certified speed measuring device or some other commonly accepted method prior to its use at each system location.

(b) Each local authority shall clearly and conspicuously mark on the outside of the trailer, vehicle, or wheeled apparatus that contains the traffic law photo-monitoring device that the device is contained therein and that the trailer, vehicle, or wheeled apparatus is the property of the local authority.

(C) In the case of a traffic law photo-monitoring device that is used at an intersection to detect violations of section 4511.12 of the Revised Code based on the failure to comply with section 4511.13 of the Revised Code or a substantially equivalent municipal ordinance, the local authority shall not issue a ticket for a violation based upon evidence recorded by a traffic law photo-monitoring device when a vehicle makes a legal right or left turn-on-red-signal if all of the following apply:

(1) The vehicle can make the turn safely.

(2) The vehicle comes to a complete stop at any point prior to completing the turn.

(3) No pedestrians are in the crosswalk, or are about to enter the crosswalk, of any approach to the intersection the vehicle occupies while commencing or making the turn.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2015–2019 · leading case: City of Toledo v. State, 2019-Ohio-1681, 130 N.E.3d 341.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Toledo v. State, 2019-Ohio-1681, 130 N.E.3d 341. · cites it 13× “R.C. 4511.0911 {¶ 89} Division (A) of R.C.”
Dayton v. State, 2017-Ohio-6909. “And R.C. 4511.0911 requires the manufacturers of the photo-monitoring devices to provide maintenance records to local authorities upon request and to attest to the accuracy of the devices annually.”
Toledo v. Ohio, 2016-Ohio-4906. · cites it 2× “” Id. at ¶ 38. {¶ 69} In support of its conclusion, the court noted that S.”
Toledo v. State, 2017-Ohio-8955, 98 N.E.3d 222. · cites it 2× “099, which grants an administrative hearing to those wishing to contest a photo-enforcement ticket; and  R.C. 4511.0911(A) and (B), which require manufacturers to certify the accuracy of photo-enforcement devices and provide maintenance records.”
Springfield v. State, 2016-Ohio-725. · cites it 2× “0912 were unconstitutional as it had in its complaint, Springfield asserted that R.C. 4511.0911, R.C. 4511.092, R.C. 4511.”
Toledo v. Ohio, 2017-Ohio-215. “099 (providing for an administrative hearing for those wishing to appeal a citation under the automated traffic control program); (7) R.C. 4511.0911(A) and (B) (requiring manufacturers to provide maintenance records for photo-monitoring devices, along with a certificate of…”
Dayton v. State, 2015-Ohio-3160, 36 N.E.3d 235. “R.C. 4511.0911 – This section contains requirements for the manufacturer of the traffic camera to provide to the local authority the maintenance record for each traffic camera used in the municipality, and an annual certificate of proper operation for each traffic camera.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.0911(A): 4 cases
Toledo v. State, 2017-Ohio-8955, 98 N.E.3d 222. “099, which grants an administrative hearing to those wishing to contest a photo-enforcement ticket; and  R.C. 4511.0911(A) and (B), which require manufacturers to certify the accuracy of photo-enforcement devices and provide maintenance records.”
Toledo v. Ohio, 2016-Ohio-4906. “” Id. at ¶ 38. {¶ 69} In support of its conclusion, the court noted that S.”
City of Toledo v. State, 2019-Ohio-1681, 130 N.E.3d 341. “R.C. 4511.0911 {¶ 89} Division (A) of R.C.”
Toledo v. Ohio, 2017-Ohio-215. “099 (providing for an administrative hearing for those wishing to appeal a citation under the automated traffic control program); (7) R.C. 4511.0911(A) and (B) (requiring manufacturers to provide maintenance records for photo-monitoring devices, along with a certificate of…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.0911(B): 1 case
City of Toledo v. State, 2019-Ohio-1681, 130 N.E.3d 341. “R.C. 4511.0911 {¶ 89} Division (A) of R.C.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.0911(B)(2)(b): 1 case
City of Toledo v. State, 2019-Ohio-1681, 130 N.E.3d 341. “R.C. 4511.0911 {¶ 89} Division (A) of R.C.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.0911(C): 1 case
City of Toledo v. State, 2019-Ohio-1681, 130 N.E.3d 341. “R.C. 4511.0911 {¶ 89} Division (A) of R.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.