Okla. Stat. » Title 21 — CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 21-1111v1 (HB 1995, Laws 2025, c. 60, 1) OS 21-1111v2 (SB 630, Laws 2025, c. 103, § 1) OS 21-1111v3 (HB 1003, Laws 2025, c. 365, § 1)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 89 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Warner v. State, 2006 OK CR 40 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Warner v. State, 2006 OK CR 40 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “7 and 843) and First Degree Rape (Count II) (21 O.S.1991, §§ 1111 and 1114), Case No. CF-97-5249, in the District Court of Oklahoma County.”
Mitchell v. State, 2006 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “1991, § 1720, First-Degree Rape, in violation of 21 O.S.1991, §§ 1111, 1114, and Forcible Anal Sodomy, in violation of 21 O.”
State of Iowa v. Michael Cory Kelso-Christy, 911 N.W.2d 663 (Iowa 2018). · cites it 2× “111 and 114) (providing sexual penetration of another “through concealment” constitutes criminal sexual conduct in the first degree); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1111 (6) (West, Westlaw through ch.”
Holtzclaw v. State, 2019 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019). · cites it 9× “2011, § 888 (Counts 8, 10, 16, and 27); Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.2011, §§ 1111, 1114 (Counts 11, 28, 29 and 32); and Rape in the Second Degree in violation of 21 O.”
Pullen v. State, 2016 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “SUMMARY OPINION HUDSON, JUDGE: ¶ 1 Appellant Ashley Reed Pullen was tried and convicted by a jury for the crime of First Degree Rape by Narcotic or Anesthetic Agent, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(A)(4), in Tulsa County District Court, *925 Case No.”
Gregg v. State, 844 P.2d 867 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). · cites it 4× “1981 , *871 § 886) (Counts 14, 15, 17, 26, 29, 31, 35, 36, 39, 40, 42 & 43) four counts of Second Degree Rape (21 O.S.Supp. 1984, § 1111; 21 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 1114) (Counts 32, 33, 38 & 41) and three counts of First Degree Rape (21 O.”
Cody v. State, 361 P.2d 307 (Okla. Crim. App. 1961). · cites it 6× “” 21 O.S. § 1111 — “Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a female, not the wife of the perpetrator, under either of the following circumstances : * ⅜ ⅝ ⅜ ⅝ * “4th.”
United States v. Faustino Gomez, 757 F.3d 885 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “02; Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, §§ 1111 , 1114(B); Or.”
Arganbright v. State, 2014 OK CR 5 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “" 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(7). ¶4 Under the plain language of Section 1111(7), it applies only where the victim is in legal custody or supervision.”
Brown v. Flowers, 974 F.3d 1178 (10th Cir. 2020). “See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1111 (7). Brown then filed this § 1983 action in federal district court.”
United States v. Miles, 327 F. App'x 797 (10th Cir. 2009). · cites it 7× “First, it contained an additional 7 The judge said: In its most recent submissions to the court, the government asserts that it can prove that the defendant coerced or threatened the alleged victim in this case to engage in sexual intercourse and that this conduct constitutes a…”
Crawford v. Cuomo, 796 F.3d 252 (2d Cir. 2015). “11, § 1259; Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111 (A)(7). . Although the precise conduct prohibited varies by state, sexual contact is generally defined as intentional contact, for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse, of an inmate's sexual or intimate areas by a…”
Show all 89 citing cases →
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(1) — 1 case
Johnston v. State, 681 P.2d 90 (Okla. Crim. App. 1984).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(3) — 4 cases
Plotner v. State, 762 P.2d 936 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
Gilmore v. State, 855 P.2d 143 (Okla. Crim. App. 1993).
Pierce v. State, 766 P.2d 365 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
Johnston v. State, 681 P.2d 90 (Okla. Crim. App. 1984).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(7) — 3 cases
Arganbright v. State, 2014 OK CR 5 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014). “" 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(7). ¶4 Under the plain language of Section 1111(7), it applies only where the victim is in legal custody or supervision.”
In Re the Habeas Corpus of Childers, 310 P.2d 776 (Okla. Crim. App. 1957).
Arganbright v. State, 2014 OK CR 5 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(8) — 1 case
Cody v. State, 361 P.2d 307 (Okla. Crim. App. 1961). “” 21 O.S. § 1111 — “Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a female, not the wife of the perpetrator, under either of the following circumstances : * ⅜ ⅝ ⅜ ⅝ * “4th.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(A) — 2 cases
Warner v. State, 2006 OK CR 40 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006). “7 and 843) and First Degree Rape (Count II) (21 O.S.1991, §§ 1111 and 1114), Case No. CF-97-5249, in the District Court of Oklahoma County.”
Mitchell v. State, 2006 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006). “1991, § 1720, First-Degree Rape, in violation of 21 O.S.1991, §§ 1111, 1114, and Forcible Anal Sodomy, in violation of 21 O.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(A)(1) — 3 cases
Arganbright v. State, 2014 OK CR 5 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014). “" 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(7). ¶4 Under the plain language of Section 1111(7), it applies only where the victim is in legal custody or supervision.”
United States v. Miles, 327 F. App'x 797 (10th Cir. 2009). “First, it contained an additional 7 The judge said: In its most recent submissions to the court, the government asserts that it can prove that the defendant coerced or threatened the alleged victim in this case to engage in sexual intercourse and that this conduct constitutes a…”
Arganbright v. State, 2014 OK CR 5 (Okla. Crim. App. 2014).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(A)(3) — 2 cases
Holtzclaw v. State, 2019 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019). “2011, § 888 (Counts 8, 10, 16, and 27); Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.2011, §§ 1111, 1114 (Counts 11, 28, 29 and 32); and Rape in the Second Degree in violation of 21 O.”
Lynch v. State, 909 P.2d 800 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(A)(4) — 2 cases
Pullen v. State, 2016 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). “SUMMARY OPINION HUDSON, JUDGE: ¶ 1 Appellant Ashley Reed Pullen was tried and convicted by a jury for the crime of First Degree Rape by Narcotic or Anesthetic Agent, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(A)(4), in Tulsa County District Court, *925 Case No.”
Pullen v. State, 2016 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(A)(5) — 2 cases
Pullen v. State, 2016 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). “SUMMARY OPINION HUDSON, JUDGE: ¶ 1 Appellant Ashley Reed Pullen was tried and convicted by a jury for the crime of First Degree Rape by Narcotic or Anesthetic Agent, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(A)(4), in Tulsa County District Court, *925 Case No.”
Pullen v. State, 2016 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1111(B) — 3 cases
United States v. Miles, 327 F. App'x 797 (10th Cir. 2009). “First, it contained an additional 7 The judge said: In its most recent submissions to the court, the government asserts that it can prove that the defendant coerced or threatened the alleged victim in this case to engage in sexual intercourse and that this conduct constitutes a…”
Laffoon v. Whitten (10th Cir. 2024).
Laffoon v. Whitten (10th Cir. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.