Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 888 (2026)
See the following versions:
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
OS 21-888v1 (SB 1425, Laws 2002, c. 455, 4) OS 21-888v2 (HB 2104, Laws 2025, c. 486, § 48)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 60
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Cannon v. State, 904 P.2d 89 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995).
Cannon v. State, 904 P.2d 89 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995). “1981 , § 1114, and Forcible Anal Sodomy in violation of 21 O.S.Supp. 1982, § 888. At the conclusion of the first stage of trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty.”
Gordon v. State, 2019 OK CR 24 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019). “It is from this judgment and sentence that Appellant appeals. ¶2 Appellant raises the following propositions of error in this appeal: I.”
Holtzclaw v. State, 2019 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019). “2011, §§ 1111, 1114 (Count 31), in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No.”
Thompson v. State, 2019 OK CR 3 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019). “2011, §§ 646 & 647, and one count of Pattern of Criminal Offenses (Count 6) in violation of 21 O.”
Mitchell v. State, 2006 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006). “1991, §§ 1111, 1114, and Forcible Anal Sodomy, in violation of 21 O.S.1991, § 888, in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No.”
Virgin v. State, 792 P.2d 1186 (Okla. Crim. App. 1990). “1985, § 1123, each After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies, in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No.”
Bartell v. State, 881 P.2d 92 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). “CRF-88-6937, and convicted of one count of Forcible Oral Sodomy (21 O.S.Supp. 1982, § 888). The jury recommended he be sentenced to thirteen (13) years imprisonment, and the trial court sentenced accordingly.”
United States v. Degeare, 884 F.3d 1241 (10th Cir. 2018). “In doing so, the sentencing court treated five of Degeare's previous Oklahoma convictions as ACCA predicates: (1) his 1990 conviction for forcible sodomy, see Okla.”
Stevens v. State, 2018 OK CR 11 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “CF-1994-91; and Forcible Sodomy ( 21 O.S.Supp.1992, § 888 ) in Case No. CF-1994-230.”
Plotner v. State, 762 P.2d 936 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “10) He claims that language fails to charge a crime under 21 O.S.Supp. 1982, § 888, which requires "forcing another to engage" in the prohibited acts.”
Collins v. State, 2009 OK CR 32 (Okla. Crim. App. 2009). “NOTES [1] Collins was also charged, but acquitted, on two counts of Forcible Oral Sodomy, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2006, § 888 (Counts II and VI).”
Sanchez v. State, 2017 OK CR 22 (Okla. Crim. App. 2017). “1991, § 1114(A)(3); and Count 3, forcible sodomy, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.1992, § 888(B)(3), in Cleveland County District Court, Case No.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 888(B)(1) — 1 case
Reupert v. State, 947 P.2d 198 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 888(B)(3) — 4 cases
Holtzclaw v. State, 2019 OK CR 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 2019). “2011, §§ 1111, 1114 (Count 31), in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No.”
Sanchez v. State, 2017 OK CR 22 (Okla. Crim. App. 2017). “1991, § 1114(A)(3); and Count 3, forcible sodomy, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.1992, § 888(B)(3), in Cleveland County District Court, Case No.”
Collins v. State, 2009 OK CR 32 (Okla. Crim. App. 2009). “NOTES [1] Collins was also charged, but acquitted, on two counts of Forcible Oral Sodomy, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2006, § 888 (Counts II and VI).”
Sanchez v. State, 2017 OK CR 22 (Okla. Crim. App. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.