Okla. Stat. » Title 75 — STATUTES AND REPORTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 308a (2026)

Jurisdiction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of Article II of the Administrative Procedures Act govern the hearing procedures of agencies, and does not grant jurisdiction, not otherwise provided by law. The Legislature recognizes that agencies take actions and make decisions, other than by individual proceedings for which the right to judicial review is intended to be exercised pursuant to other laws. Added by Laws 1992, c. 310, § 7, eff. July 1, 1992.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994). · cites it 2× “II of the Administrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S.Supp. 1992, §§ 308a, et seq., we should nonetheless hold it bound by provisions of that article which impose certain due process requirements on agency proceedings, and especially by the terms of § 316 which call for the…”
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. State, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 2002 OK 42 (Okla. 2002). · cites it 3× “1998 § 225, infra note 39. [26] The terms of 75 O.”
State Ex Rel. Okla. State Bd. of Med. Licensure & Supervision v. Rivero, 2021 OK 31 (Okla. 2021). “Article II of the Administrative Procedures Act ("APA"), 75 O.S. § 308a, et seq., governs individual proceedings by Office of the Attorney General for revocation, denial, suspension and non-renewal of certification or for reprimand of certified facilities.”
Feightner v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A., 2003 OK 20 (Okla. 2003). “Article II of the OAPA, 75 O.S.2001, § 308a et. seq. generally governs the hearing procedures of state agency adjudicative process.”
Davuluri v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bd. of Med. Licensure & Supervision, 10 P.3d 198 (Okla. 2000). “75 O.S.1991 §§ 308a et seq. The Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision is not among the agencies that stand exempted, nor is review of the Board's disciplinary orders so exempted.”
Bills v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Human Svcs., 2011 OK CIV APP 19 (Okla. Civ. App. 2010). “¶ 7 In an effort to secure judicial review, Lighthouse Learning filed an appeal pursuant to the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S.2001 § 308a et seq. Pertinent to the case at hand, § 308a states: The provisions of Article II of the Administrative Procedures Act…”
Stripling v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Health Care Auth., 2017 OK CIV APP 6 (Okla. Civ. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “See 75 O.S.2011 §§ 308a to 323; City of Hugo v.”
W. Heights Indep. Sch. Dist. v. State, 2022 OK 79 (Okla. 2022). · cites it 2× “" 75 O.S.2011 § 308a ¶90 The power and authority placing the school district on probation status was pursuant to a statutory power granted the State Board by the Legislature.”
Stripling v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Health Care Auth., 394 P.3d 293 (Okla. Civ. App. 2016). “See 75 O.S.2011 §§ 308a to 323; City of Hugo v.”
Dept. of Human Servs. Child Support Servs. v. Coldwater, 2014 OK CIV APP 56 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “7(3) and 75 O.S. 2011 §308a with 43 O.S. 2011 §551-201.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.