A. In an individual proceeding, all parties shall be afforded an opportunity for hearing after reasonable notice. B. The notice shall include: 1. A statement of the time, place and nature of the hearing; 2. A statement of the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held; 3. A reference to the particular sections of the statutes and rules involved; and 4. A short and plain statement of the matters asserted. If the agency or other party is unable to state the matters in detail at the time the notice is served, the initial notice may be limited to a statement of the issues involved. Thereafter upon application a more definite and detailed statement shall be furnished. C. Opportunity shall be afforded all parties to respond and present evidence and argument on all issues involved. D. Deliberations by administrative heads, hearing examiners, and other persons authorized by law may be held in executive session pursuant to paragraph 8 of subsection B of Section 307 of Title 25 of the Oklahoma Statutes. E. Unless precluded by law, informal disposition may be made of any individual proceeding by stipulation, agreed settlement, consent order, or default. F. The record in an individual proceeding shall include: 1. All pleadings, motions and intermediate rulings; 2. Evidence received or considered at the individual proceeding; 3. A statement of matters officially noticed; 4. Questions and offers of proof, objections, and rulings thereon; 5. Proposed findings and exceptions; 6. Any decision, opinion, or report by the officer presiding at the hearing; and 7. All other evidence or data submitted to the hearing examiner or administrative head in connection with their consideration of the case provided all parties have had access to such evidence. G. Oral proceedings shall be electronically recorded. Such recordings shall be maintained for such time so as to protect the record through judicial review. Copies of the recordings shall be provided by the agency at the request of any party to the proceeding. Costs of transcription of the recordings shall be borne by the party requesting the transcription. For judicial review, electronic recordings of an individual proceeding, as certified by the agency, may be submitted to the reviewing court by the agency as
part of the record of the proceedings under review without transcription unless otherwise required to be transcribed by the reviewing court. In such case, the expense of transcriptions shall be taxed and assessed against the nonprevailing party. Parties to any proceeding may have the proceedings transcribed by a court reporter at their own expense. H. Findings of fact shall be based exclusively on the evidence received and on matters officially noticed in the individual proceeding unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties on the record. Added by Laws 1963, c. 371, § 9. Amended by Laws 1992, c. 310, § 8, eff. July 1, 1992; Laws 1994, c. 384, § 12, eff. July 1, 1994.
Notes of Decisions
DuLaney v. Oklahoma State Dep't of Health, 868 P.2d 676 (Okla. 1993).
· cites it 6× “2 We find that adjacent landowners and mineral interest owners are entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard in an individual proceeding conducted pursuant to 75 O.S.1981 § 309 3 before a landfill permit issues.”
State ex rel. Okla. State Bd. of Med. Licensure & Supervision v. Rivero, 2021 OK 31, 489 P.3d 36.
· cites it 4× “89 75 O.S.2011 § 309(D): D. Deliberations by administrative heads, hearing examiners, and other persons authorized by law may be held in executive session pursuant to paragraph 8 of subsection B of Section 307 of Title 25 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm'n, 873 P.2d 1001 (Okla. 1994).
· cites it 3× “II adjudicative process (75 O.S.1991 §§ 309 et seq.). . For the pertinent terms of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amend.”
Purcell v. Parker, 2020 OK 83, 475 P.3d 834.
· cites it 2× “Title 75 O.S. 2011 §309 provides: A. In an individual proceeding, all parties shall be afforded an opportunity for hearing after reasonable notice.”
Grand River Dam Auth. v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 (Okla. 1982).
“Appellant argues, in the alternative, that an opinion of the attorney general should be considered an “order” resulting from the “individual proceedings” provided for by the APA, 75 O.S.1971 § 309. An affirmative determination would be of no help to appellant.”
Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 827 P.2d 1314 (Okla. 1992).
“As specified, the following agencies or classes of agency activities are not required to comply with the provisions of Article II of the Administrative Procedures Act [75 O.S.1981 § 309 et seq.]: "1. The Oklahoma Tax Commission; " * * * " (Emphasis added.”
Citizens for the Prot. of the Arbuckle-simpson Aquifer v. Okla. Dept. of Mines, 437 P.3d 1074 (Okla. Civ. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “In fact, the OAPA itself suggests that an informal procedure may be employed as part of an "individual proceeding," for example in 75 O.S.2011 § 309(E), which states, "Unless precluded by law, informal disposition may be made of any individual proceeding by stipulation, agreed…”
State ex rel. Henry v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 825 P.2d 1305 (Okla. 1992).
“The agency’s experience, technical competence, and specialized knowledge may be utilized in the evaluation of the evidence." (Emphasis added.”
State ex rel. Dep't of Highways v. Brown, 462 P.2d 261 (Okla. 1969).
· cites it 2× “The recent amendment requiring a copy of the petition to be attached to the summons serves further to expand the quantum of knowledge our Legislature intended the defendant to have. 12 O.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 309(B): 1 case
Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 309(D): 1 case
Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 309(E): 3 cases
Citizens for the Prot. of the Arbuckle-simpson Aquifer v. Okla. Dept. of Mines, 437 P.3d 1074 (Okla. Civ. App. 2018).
“In fact, the OAPA itself suggests that an informal procedure may be employed as part of an "individual proceeding," for example in 75 O.S.2011 § 309(E), which states, "Unless precluded by law, informal disposition may be made of any individual proceeding by stipulation, agreed…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 309(F): 2 cases
Citizens for the Prot. of the Arbuckle-simpson Aquifer v. Okla. Dept. of Mines, 437 P.3d 1074 (Okla. Civ. App. 2018).
“In fact, the OAPA itself suggests that an informal procedure may be employed as part of an "individual proceeding," for example in 75 O.S.2011 § 309(E), which states, "Unless precluded by law, informal disposition may be made of any individual proceeding by stipulation, agreed…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 309(F)(1): 1 case
Okla. Stat. tit. 75, § 309(G): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.