Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.485 (2026)

Decision of court on review of contested case

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      183.485 Decision of court on review of contested case. (1) The court having jurisdiction for judicial review of contested cases shall direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency issuing the order being reviewed and may direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county designated by the prevailing party for entry in the circuit court’s register.

      (2) Upon receipt of the court’s decision, including the judgment, the clerk of the circuit court shall enter a judgment in the register of the court pursuant to the direction of the court to which the appeal is made. [1973 c.612 §7; 1981 c.178 §11; 1985 c.540 §39; 2003 c.576 §193]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1989–2008 · leading case: Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 779 P.2d 1028 (Or. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 779 P.2d 1028 (Or. 1989). “3 Former ORS 183.485, in effect at the time the Van Gordon case was decided, provided: “Upon judicial review of a final order of an agency when the reviewing court reverses or remands the order it may, in its discretion, award costs, including reasonable attorney fees, to the…”
Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Emp. Dep't, 111 P.3d 739 (Or. 2005). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to “direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
G.A.S.P. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 195 P.3d 66 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to ‘direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
KAIB'S ROVING v. Emp. Dept., 111 P.3d 739 (Or. 2005). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to "direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
Gasp v. Eqc, 195 P.3d 66 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to `direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.485(1): 4 cases
Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Emp. Dep't, 111 P.3d 739 (Or. 2005). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to “direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
G.A.S.P. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 195 P.3d 66 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to ‘direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
KAIB'S ROVING v. Emp. Dept., 111 P.3d 739 (Or. 2005). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to "direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
Gasp v. Eqc, 195 P.3d 66 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “ORS 183.485(1) requires a court having judicial review of contested cases to direct its decision, including its judgment, to the agency that issued the order being reviewed, and permits the court to `direct that its judgment be delivered to the circuit court for any county…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.