Sec. 21.002. TEACHER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS. (a) A school district shall employ each classroom teacher, principal, librarian, nurse, or school counselor under:
(1) a probationary contract, as provided by Subchapter C;
(2) a continuing contract, as provided by Subchapter D; or
(3) a term contract, as provided by Subchapter E.
(b) A district is not required to employ a person other than an employee listed in Subsection (a) under a probationary, continuing, or term contract.
(c) Each board of trustees shall establish a policy designating specific positions of employment, or categories of positions based on considerations such as length of service, to which continuing contracts or term contracts apply.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.
Amended by:
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 443 (S.B. 715), Sec. 7, eff. June 14, 2013.
Notes of Decisions
Godley Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Woods, 21 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. App. 2000).
· cites it 2× “Additionally, there are fact issues at stake in the controversy because Woods claims that GISD made certain representations as to the performance of his contract and that he complied with the district's requirements to take his personal leave, assertions that GISD has…”
Wittman v. Nelson, 100 S.W.3d 356 (Tex. App. 2002).
“Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 21.002 (Vernon 1996).”
Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Joseph Palazzolo (Tex. App. 2019).
“2000); see Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 21.002 (c) (requiring each school board to establish a policy designating specific positions of employment or categories of positions based on considerations such as length of service to which continuing contracts or term contracts apply), § 21.”
Irving Butler II v. Responsive Educ. Solutions (Tex. App. 2024).
“See Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 21.002 (a). Butler extrapolates that Appellee should not be afforded the same governmental immunity as a public school district unless it also provided its classroom teachers with Chapter 21 employment contracts, and thus he must have had an employment…”
— Tex. Educ. Code § 21.002(a) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.