Tex. Codes
» Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE B. SUITS AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · CHAPTER 153. CONSERVATORSHIP, POSSESSION, AND ACCESS
Sec. 153.003. NO DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR MARITAL STATUS. The court shall consider the qualifications of the parties without regard to their marital status or to the sex of the party or the child in determining:
(1) which party to appoint as sole managing conservator;
(2) whether to appoint a party as joint managing conservator; and
(3) the terms and conditions of conservatorship and possession of and access to the child.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.
Notes of Decisions
Epps v. Deboise, 537 S.W.3d 238 (Tex. App. 2017).
“Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.003 (West 2014).”
Dennis v. Smith, 962 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “, § 3a; TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 153.003 (Vernon 1996) (in deciding conservatorship, possession, and access); TEX.”
In Re Guthrie, 45 S.W.3d 719 (Tex. App. 2001).
“See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.003 (prohibiting discrimination based on sex in determining conservatorship), § 154.”
Martinez v. Molinar, 953 S.W.2d 399 (Tex. App. 1997).
“Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 153.003 (Vernon 1996).”
Orlando Marquez v. Cynthia Cantu (Tex. App. 2018).
· cites it 3× “” Tex. Fam. Code § 153.003(3). Marquez, however, failed to preserve this issue for our review.”
in the Interest of R.H., J.B., & T.B. (Tex. App. 2013).
“See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.003 (3) (West 2008) (stating that a trial court shall not consider the gender of the parent in determining the terms and conditions of conservatorship and possession of a child).”
in the Interest of R.H., J.B., & T.B. (Tex. App. 2013).
“See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.003 (3) (West 2008) (stating that a trial court shall not consider the gender of the parent in determining the terms and conditions of conservatorship and possession of a child).”
Tex. Fam. Code § 153.003(3): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.