Texas Codes
Tex. Fam. Code § 81.009 (2026)
Appeal
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 81.009. APPEAL. (a) Except as provided by Subsections (b) and (c), a protective order rendered under this subtitle may be appealed.
(b) A protective order rendered against a party in a suit for dissolution of a marriage may not be appealed until the time the final decree of dissolution of the marriage becomes a final, appealable order.
(c) A protective order rendered against a party in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship may not be appealed until the time an order providing for support of the child or possession of or access to the child becomes a final, appealable order.
Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 916 (H.B. 260), Sec. 2, eff. June 18, 2005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50
cases (26 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: Marcus Joseph Roper v. Katherine Elizabeth Jolliffe, 493 S.W.3d 624 (Tex. App. 2015).
Marcus Joseph Roper v. Katherine Elizabeth Jolliffe, 493 S.W.3d 624 (Tex. App. 2015). “See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009 (enacted in 2005).”
Culver v. Culver, 360 S.W.3d 526 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 81.009(b) (West 2008).”
Keck v. Loftin, 329 S.W.3d 658 (Tex. App. 2010). “” Tex. Fam.Code § 81.009. If either of the exceptions applies, then appeal of the protective order must await issuance of a final, appealable order in the underlying case.”
Jermaine Watts v. Lisa Adviento (Tex. App. 2019). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 81.009 ; Keck, 329 S.”
in Re: Michael L. Bird (Tex. App. 2019). “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009 (West 2019); In re 3 See In re Bird, No.”
B.E.K. v. C.G.E. (Tex. App. 2024). “Texas Family Code Section 81.009 provides that a protective order is immediately appealable unless it was rendered against (1) a party in a suit for dissolution of marriage or (2) a party in a suit affecting the parent–child relationship before a final, appealable order is…”
Sheri Taylor v. Melody Ann Norton (Tex. App. 2024). “” (citing TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009)). Further, since Taylor’s motion to vacate challenged the subject-matter jurisdiction of the trial court, it could be construed as a plea to the jurisdiction.”
Danny Patrick McCoy v. Edith Yedida McCoy (Tex. App. 2025). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 81.009(b) (“A protective order rendered against a party in a suit for dissolution of a marriage may not be appealed until the time the final decree of dissolution of the marriage becomes a final, appealable order.”
John Belmont v. Claudia Belmont (Tex. App. 2025). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 81.009 (b) (“A protective order rendered against a party in a suit for dissolution of a marriage may not be appealed until the time the final decree of dissolution of the marriage becomes a final, appealable order.”
in the Interest of A.M.G. & E.J.G., Child. (Tex. App. 2016). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009(c) (West 2014).”
in the Interest of A.M.G. & E.J.G., Child. (Tex. App. 2016). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009(c) (West 2014).”
Humberto Fabian Caballero v. Maria Christian Caballero (Tex. App. 2017). “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 81.009 (West 2014).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 81.009(a) — 6 cases
Guillermo Puente v. Alicia Marie Puente (Tex. App. 2019).
in Re: Viridiana Martinez (Tex. App. 2019).
Samar Aijaz v. Matthew Arellano (Tex. App. 2023).
Samar Aijaz v. Matthew Arellano (Tex. App. 2023).
Sheri Taylor v. Melody Ann Norton (Tex. App. 2024). “” (citing TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009)). Further, since Taylor’s motion to vacate challenged the subject-matter jurisdiction of the trial court, it could be construed as a plea to the jurisdiction.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 81.009(b) — 7 cases
Culver v. Culver, 360 S.W.3d 526 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 81.009(b) (West 2008).”
Danny Patrick McCoy v. Edith Yedida McCoy (Tex. App. 2025). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 81.009(b) (“A protective order rendered against a party in a suit for dissolution of a marriage may not be appealed until the time the final decree of dissolution of the marriage becomes a final, appealable order.”
Diego Velasquez v. Ximena Rayon (Tex. App. 2022).
Diego Velasquez v. Regina Rayon (Tex. App. 2022).
Diego Velasquez v. Daniela Rayon (Tex. App. 2022).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 81.009(c) — 4 cases
in the Interest of A.M.G. & E.J.G., Child. (Tex. App. 2016). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009(c) (West 2014).”
in the Interest of A.M.G. & E.J.G., Child. (Tex. App. 2016). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009(c) (West 2014).”
Jarelle Hightower v. Chelsea Pearl (Tex. App. 2022).
A.C. v. S.G.A. (2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.