Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 87.001 (2026)

Modification Of Protective Order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 87.001. MODIFICATION OF PROTECTIVE ORDER. On the motion of any party, the court, after notice and hearing, may modify an existing protective order to:

(1) exclude any item included in the order; or

(2) include any item that could have been included in the order.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 34, Sec. 1, eff. May 5, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: B.C. v. Rhodes Ex Rel. T.L.R., 116 S.W.3d 878 (Tex. App. 2003).
B.C. v. Rhodes Ex Rel. T.L.R., 116 S.W.3d 878 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 6× “As with permanent injunctions, the trial court's continuing ability to modify a family-violence protective order does not convert it from final to interlocutory. See id. It is the disposition of the parties and the issues—not the retention of jurisdiction—that determines the…”
James v. Hubbard, 985 S.W.2d 516 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “2d at 403 ; see TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 87.001 (Vernon Supp.”
In Re Salgado, 53 S.W.3d 752 (Tex. App. 2001). “Laws 5101 (current version found at Tex.Fam. Code Ann. § 87.001). 7 . Salgado also argues that the application for a protective order is, in actuality, a suit affecting the parent-child relationship under Title 2.”
Bilyeu v. Bilyeu, 86 S.W.3d 278 (Tex. App. 2002). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 87.001. Further, there is no statutory provision designating a modification of a protective order proceeding as a new suit or keeping in place any of the original provisions or rulings.”
Cooke v. Cooke, 65 S.W.3d 785 (Tex. App. 2002). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 87.001 (Vernon Supp.”
Culver v. Culver, 360 S.W.3d 526 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 87.001, 87.003 (West 2008).”
in the Interest of J.K.R. & H.L.R., Child. (Tex. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “However, “[a] protective order may not be modified to extend the period of the order’s validity beyond the second anniversary of the date the original order was rendered or beyond the date the order expires under [§] 85.025(a-1) or (c), whichever date occurs later.”
J.A.T. v. C.s.t (Tex. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “001, “[o]n the motion of any party, the court, after notice and hearing, may modify an existing protective order to: (1) exclude any item included in the order; or (2) include any item that could have been included in the order.”
Jaron Maurice Lynch v. Samantha Jacqueline Lopez (Tex. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 87.001 . The parameters of Section 87.”
Michael Christopher Tate v. Maria Concepcion Landa (Tex. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code § 87.001 (addressing requests to modify to (1) exclude any item 8 included in the order; or (2) include any item that could have been included in the order).”
B. C. v. Scotty L. Rhodes on Behalf of T. L. R. (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “; see Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 87.001 (West 2002).”
Suzanna Eckchum A/K/A Susan Eckhert v. State (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “28 Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 87.001 ............”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.