Texas Codes

Tex. Occ. Code § 201.1525 (2026)

Rules Clarifying Scope Of Practice Of Chiropractic

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 201.1525. RULES CLARIFYING SCOPE OF PRACTICE OF CHIROPRACTIC. The board shall adopt rules clarifying what activities are included within the scope of the practice of chiropractic and what activities are outside of that scope. The rules:

(1) must clearly specify the procedures that chiropractors may perform;

(2) must clearly specify any equipment and the use of that equipment that is prohibited; and

(3) may require a license holder to obtain additional training or certification to perform certain procedures or use certain equipment.

Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1020 (H.B. 972), Sec. 8, eff. September 1, 2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2021 · leading case: Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 270 S.W.3d 777 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008).
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 270 S.W.3d 777 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (current version at Tex. Occ.Code Ann. § 201.1525 (West Supp.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners Patrick Fortner v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 616 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2021). · cites it 5× “”) (current version at TEX. OCC. CODE § 201.1525). 26 Act of May 26, 1981, 67th Leg.”
Texas Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Med. v. Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Patricia Gilbert, No. 03-15-00262-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 10, 2015). · cites it 2× “5, 15, 20-21, 24, 26-27, 46 TEX. OCC. CODE § 201.152 ................”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd., No. 03-08-00058-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 26, 2008). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (current version at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.1525 (West Supp.”
Charles Monroe Waller v. State, No. 03-08-00328-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 26, 2008). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (current version at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.1525 (West Supp.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd., No. 03-08-00058-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 15, 2008). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (current version at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.1525 (West Supp.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd., No. 03-08-00058-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 15, 2008). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (current version at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.1525 (West Supp.”
Texas Mut. Ins. Co. v. Michael M. Stelzer, No. 03-06-00675-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 236 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 13, 2010). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (current version at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.1525 (West Supp.”
Texas Mut. Ins. Co. v. Michael M. Stelzer, No. 03-06-00675-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 13, 2010). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (current version at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.1525 (West Supp.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Yvette Yarbrough v. Texas Med. Ass'n, No. 03-12-00151-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 21, 2012). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (codified at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 201.1525 -.1526).1 In response, the Board promulgated a “Scope of Practice” rule that, among other things, authorizes certain chiropractors to perform “Technological Instrumented Vestibular-Ocular-Nystagmus Testing” (VONT).”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Yvette Yarbrough v. Texas Med. Ass'n, No. 03-12-00151-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 21, 2012). “Laws 3464 , 3466 (codified at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 201.1525 -.1526). (1) In response, the Board promulgated a "Scope of Practice" rule that, among other things, authorizes certain chiropractors to perform "Technological Instrumented Vestibular-Ocular-Nystagmus Testing" (VONT).”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, No. 03-10-00673-CV (Tex. App.—Austin July 6, 2012). “Laws at 3466 (codified at Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 201.1525 -.1526). Among other implications, this rule-making mandate ensured that TBCE would issue scope-of-practice directives to its licensees in a form that opponents could test in court to determine whether they exceeded the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.